Siskin v. Fownes Brothers & Co, Incorporated

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING 17 Notice of Pending Settlement and Stipulation Requesting Continuation of Deadlines Pending Settlement. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/6/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/13/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland.Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/21/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2015)

Download PDF
Case4:15-cv-02922-JSW Document17 Filed09/18/15 Page1 of 5 1 5 DAVID T. WEI (230729)(dwei@ax-law.com) MARCEL F. DE ARMAS (289282)(mdearmas@ax-law.com) JAYSON S. SOHI (293176)(jsohi@ax-law.com) AXCEL LAW PARTNERS LLP 4 Embarcadero Center, 14th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone 415-704-8800 Facsimile 415-704-8804 Email info@ax-law.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID R. SISKIN 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID R. SISKIN, CASE NO.: 4:15-CV-02922-JSW 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 FOWNES BROTHERS & CO., INC., 15 NOTICE OF PENDING SETTLEMENT; STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINES PENDING SETTLEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff David R. Siskin and Defendant Fownes Brothers & Co., Inc. respectfully submit 4 Embarcadero Center, 14th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 415.704.8800 this Notice of Pending Settlement, Stipulated Request to Continue All Case Deadlines Pending 20 Axcel Law Partners LLP 19 Settlement, and [Proposed] Order. 21 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(1), the parties state the following: 22 1. The parties have reached a settlement-in-principal of all claims in this action. 23 2. The parties anticipate drafting a formal settlement agreement that will resolve this 24 matter entirely. The parties expect to submit a Joint Stipulation and Dismissal with Prejudice by 25 October 2nd, 2015. 26 3. Accordingly, the parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court stay all 27 remaining dates in this action as follows, to provide sufficient time to finalize a settlement 28 agreement: 1 NOTICE OF PENDING SETTLEMENT; STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINES PENDING SETTLEMENT Case4:15-cv-02922-JSW Document17 Filed09/18/15 Page2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 Presently Scheduled Date Proposed Date Sept. 21, 2015 Oct. 9, 2015 Last day for parties to file joint case management statement Sept. 18, 2015 November 6, 2015 Oct. 16, 2015 Initial Case Management Conference Sept. 25, 2015 November 13, 2015 Oct. 23, 2015 Event Last day for Defendant Fownes Brothers & Co, Inc. to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint 6 7 4. 8 extension of time. 9 5. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(2), the parties have not previously requested any Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(3), the requested time modification would delay the 10 current case management conference schedule by 28 calendar days. 11 Respectfully submitted, 12 Dated: September 18, 2015 15 /s/ David T. Wei David T. Wei (230729) AXCEL LAW PARTNERS LLP 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94111 dwei@ax-law.com 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff David R. Siskin 13 14 17 Dated: September 18, 2015 20 /s/ Robert W. Morris Robert W. Morris ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOT, LLC 10 Bank Street, Suite 700 White Plains, NY 10606 rwmorris@eckertseamans.com 21 Attorneys for Defendant Fownes Brothers & Co., Inc. 18 4 Embarcadero Center, 14th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 415.704.8800 Axcel Law Partners LLP 19 22 23 24 // // 25 26 27 28 2 NOTICE OF PENDING SETTLEMENT; STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINES PENDING SETTLEMENT Case4:15-cv-02922-JSW Document17 Filed09/18/15 Page3 of 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. AS MODIFIED. 3 4 5 September 21, 2015 Date: ______________________ _____________________________________ JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 4 Embarcadero Center, 14th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 415.704.8800 Axcel Law Partners LLP 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 NOTICE OF PENDING SETTLEMENT; STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINES PENDING SETTLEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?