Baldini Real Estate Inc v. Cruz et al
Filing
8
Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re Case No. 15-cv-4231. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on October 16, 2015. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BALDINI REAL ESTATE, INC.,
Case No. 15-cv-04231-JCS
Plaintiff,
8
(also filed in Case No. 15-cv-2932-YGR)
v.
9
10
FLORO LORENZO CRUZ, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
ORDER OF SUA SPONTE REFERRAL
AS TO WHETHER CASES ARE
RELATED
Civil Local Rule 3-12(c) provides that “[w]henever a Judge believes that a case pending
13
before that Judge is related to another case, the Judge may refer the case to the Judge assigned to
14
the lowest-numbered case with a request that the Judge assigned to the lowest-numbered case
15
consider whether the cases are related.”
16
This unlawful detainer action was removed from California Superior Court for the County
17
of San Mateo, where it bore the case number CLJ211119. This is the second time that Defendant
18
Floro Lorenzo Cruz has removed San Mateo County Superior Court case number CLJ211119 to
19
this Court. The previous removal, this Court’s case number 15-cv-2932, was assigned to the
20
Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. The Court remanded the case to the San Mateo County
21
Superior Court on August 12, 2015, and Cruz filed his second notice of removal—the present
22
case, this Court’s number 15-cv-4231—on September 17, 2015.
23
Because both removals arise from the same state court action, and because Cruz’s two
24
notices of removal present similar arguments, this action is REFERRED to Judge Gonzalez
25
Rogers pursuant to Rule 3-12(c) for a determination of whether this action is related to Baldini
26
Real Estate Inc. v. Cruz, No. 15-cv-2932-YGR (N.D. Cal.). Any party may file a response,
27
28
1
opposition, or statement in support of relating the cases no later than October 20, 2015.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: October 16, 2015
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The undersigned has also issued a Report and Recommendation in this case, recommending that
the case once again be remanded, that Cruz be required to pay Baldini’s attorneys’ fees, and that
an order be entered requiring pre-filing review of any further removal. If Judge Gonzalez Rogers
determines that the cases are not related, this case will be reassigned to a randomly selected United
States district judge for further proceedings, including action on those recommendations.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?