Johnson v. City and County of San Francisco

Filing 45

STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 43 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation For Filing Third Amended Complaint; [Proposed] Order filed by Dolores Johnson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 4/18/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2016)

Download PDF
1 RICHARD M. ROGERS, #045843 LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS 2 4 100 Bush Street, #1980 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/981-9788 Facsimile: 415/981-9798 Email: RogersRMR@yahoo.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 3 DOLORES JOHNSON 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 DOLORES JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) Case No.: C15-03011 KAW Case filed: Trial date: 06/29/15 11/14/16 STIPULATION FOR FILING THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER________________________ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: C15-03011 KAW – STIPULATION FOR FILING THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER JOHNSON/ /COMPLAIN.3AM-STIP 1 1 The parties stipulate to Plaintiff’s filing a Third Amended Complaint in the form of Exhibit 2 1 hereto., within seven (7) days. 3 04/07/16 Dated:_________________ Respectfully submitted, 4 LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS 5 6 By: 7 8 9 04/07/16 Dated: __________________ /s/ Richard M. Rogers RICHARD M. ROGERS Attorneys for Plaintiff DOLORES JOHNSON DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney KATHARINE HOBIN PORTER Chief Labor Attorney KENNETH M. WALCZAK Deputy City Attorney 10 11 12 13 By: 14 15 /s/ Kenneth M. Walczak KENNETH M. WALCZAK Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 21 Dated: 4/18/16 By: KANDIS A. WESTMORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE US DISTRICT COURT 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: C15-03011 KAW – STIPULATION FOR FILING THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER JOHNSON/ /COMPLAIN.3AM-STIP 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?