Johnson v. City and County of San Francisco
Filing
45
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 43 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation For Filing Third Amended Complaint; [Proposed] Order filed by Dolores Johnson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 4/18/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2016)
1
RICHARD M. ROGERS, #045843
LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS
2
4
100 Bush Street, #1980
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415/981-9788
Facsimile:
415/981-9798
Email:
RogersRMR@yahoo.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
3
DOLORES JOHNSON
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
DOLORES JOHNSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, )
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
Case No.: C15-03011 KAW
Case filed:
Trial date:
06/29/15
11/14/16
STIPULATION FOR FILING THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER________________________
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: C15-03011 KAW – STIPULATION FOR FILING THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER
JOHNSON/
/COMPLAIN.3AM-STIP
1
1
The parties stipulate to Plaintiff’s filing a Third Amended Complaint in the form of Exhibit
2
1 hereto., within seven (7) days.
3
04/07/16
Dated:_________________
Respectfully submitted,
4
LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS
5
6
By:
7
8
9
04/07/16
Dated: __________________
/s/ Richard M. Rogers
RICHARD M. ROGERS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DOLORES JOHNSON
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
KATHARINE HOBIN PORTER
Chief Labor Attorney
KENNETH M. WALCZAK
Deputy City Attorney
10
11
12
13
By:
14
15
/s/ Kenneth M. Walczak
KENNETH M. WALCZAK
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
21
Dated: 4/18/16
By:
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE US DISTRICT COURT
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: C15-03011 KAW – STIPULATION FOR FILING THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER
JOHNSON/
/COMPLAIN.3AM-STIP
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?