Integris Wealth Management, LLC v. Integris Asset Management, LLC

Filing 16

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; EXTENDING TIME TO SERVE; AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO PLAINTIFF. Case Management Statement due by 3/11/2016. Show Cause Response due by 12/4/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/18/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland.Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 11/9/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

INTEGRIS WEALTH MANAGEMENT,
LLC,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 15-cv-03142-JSW

v.
INTEGRIS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Defendant.

ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,
EXTENDNG TIME TO SERVE AND
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO
PLAINTIFF

12
13
14

On September 24, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to continue the initial case

15

management conference, on the basis that the defendant had not yet been served. In that Order,

16

the Court noted that the deadline for service, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule

17

4(m), was November 4, 2015. The Court also stated that if Plaintiff believed additional time

18

would be required to effect service, it would be required to file a motion for extension of time to

19

serve by October 9, 2015. Plaintiff did not file a motion on that date.

20

Plaintiff did not comply with the deadline set forth by the Court in its previous Order.

21

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not impose

22

sanctions in the amount of $250.00 for failure to comply with that deadline. Plaintiff’s response to

23

this Order to Show Cause shall be due by December 4, 2015. If Plaintiff fails to file a timely

24

response, the Court shall impose the monetary sanctions without further notice to Plaintiff.

25

On November 4, 2015, the last day to effect service, Plaintiff filed a second administrative

26

motion to continue the case management conference. Plaintiff asks for a continuance on the basis

27

it still has not served the defendant. Although Plaintiff did not file a motion to extend time for

28

service, it has set forth facts in the case management statement that show it has been diligent in its

1

eff
forts to serve defendant and that show good caus to extend t time to s
e
a
w
se
the
serve defend
dant.

2

Ac
ccordingly, th Court GR
he
RANTS Plain a furthe 120 days, from the dat of this Or
ntiff
er
te
rder, to serve
e

3

def
fendant. If Plaintiff has not served defendant by February 5 2016, and requires ad
P
d
y
5,
d
dditional time
e

4

to serve, Plaint shall file a motion to extend time to serve by February 1 2016. If Plaintiff
s
tiff
e
y
12,
f

5

fail to comply with this de
ls
y
eadline, the Court shall i
C
issue a furthe order to show cause a to why
er
as

6

san
nctions shoul not be imp
ld
posed, which may includ monetary sanctions o an order to show
de
y
or
o

7

cau why the case should not be dism
use
missed for fai lure to serve
e.

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

,
G
e
e
gement conf
ference. The
e
Finally, the Court GRANTS the request to continue the case manag
cas manageme conferen scheduled for Novem
se
ent
nce
mber 13, 201 is CONT
15,
TINUED to M
March 18,
201 at 11:00 a.m. The pa
16
a
arties’ joint case managem statem shall be due on Mar 11, 2016.
c
ment
ment
rch
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: Novemb 9, 2015
ber

13
__
___________
__________
____
JE
EFFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2