Holland et al v. The Related Companies, Inc. et al
Filing
85
ORDER GRANTING 82 STIPULATION Continuing Deadlines Set in April 29, 2016 Order (doc. no. 65). Fact Discovery due by 5/27/2016. Expert Discovery due by 7/15/2016. Motion Hearing set for 7/22/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/31/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2016)
Case 4:15-cv-03220-JSW Document 82 Filed 05/27/16 Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
LYN R. AGRE (SBN 178218)
MARGARET A. ZIEMIANEK (SBN 233418)
GUNNAR K. MARTZ (SBN 300852)
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
101 California Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 655-4308
Facsimile: (415) 398-5030
lagre@kasowitz.com
mziemianek@kasowitz.com
gmartz@kasowitz.com
Attorneys for Defendants
THE RELATED COMPANIES, INC.,
THIRD AND MISSION ASSOCIATES, LLC,
and RELATED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.P.
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
101 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2300
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
9
12
PETER HOLLAND and KRISTEN
HOLLAND,
Case No. 4:15-CV-03220 JSW
Hon. Judge Jeffery S. White
13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
THE RELATED COMPANIES, INC.;
THIRD AND MISSION ASSOCIATES,
LLC; RELATED MANAGEMENT
COMPANY, L.P.; DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive
16
17
18
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES SET
IN APRIL 29, 2016 ORDER
(DKT. NO. 65)
AS MODIFIED
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Deadlines Set in April 29, 2016 Order (Dkt. No. 65);
Case No. 4:15-CV-03220
Case 4:15-cv-03220-JSW Document 82 Filed 05/27/16 Page 2 of 5
1
By and through their attorneys of record, Defendants THE RELATED COMPANIES,
2
INC., THIRD AND MISSION ASSOCIATES, LLC, and RELATED MANAGEMENT
3
COMPANY, L.P. (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiffs PETER HOLLAND and KRISTIN
4
HOLLAND (“Plaintiffs”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
5
6
WHEREAS, the Court entered an order on April 29, 2016 (Dkt. No. 65), setting case
deadlines pursuant to stipulation of the parties;
7
WHEREAS, the current schedule is as follows:
8
Fact discovery cut-off
May 23, 2016
9
Designation of experts
May 23, 2016
10
Expert discovery cut-off
June 20, 2016
11
Hearing of dispositive motions
July 8, 2016
12
Pretrial conference
September 26, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.
13
Jury selection
October 26, 2016 at 8:00 a.m.
14
Trial
October 31, 2016 at 8:00 a.m.
15
WHEREAS, Defendants’ counsel and Plaintiffs’ counsel have met and conferred, and
16
agree that extension of certain of the deadlines in the current scheduling order is warranted.
17
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto and
their respective undersigned attorneys, as follows:
19
20
The parties respectfully jointly request that the Court continue the deadlines set forth in the
April 29, 2016 Order as follows:
21
Fact discovery cut-off
May 27, 20161
22
Designation of experts
June 22, 2016
23
Expert discovery cut-off
July 15, 2016
24
Hearing of dispositive motions
July 22, 2016
25
26
27
1
Thereby extending the deadline to file discovery motions to June 3, 2016, pursuant to Local Rule
37-3.
28
2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Deadlines Set in April 29, 2016 Order (Dkt. No. 65);
Case No. 4:15-CV-03220
Case 4:15-cv-03220-JSW Document 82 Filed 05/27/16 Page 3 of 5
1
The parties propose no change to the other deadlines.
2
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
Respectfully submitted,
5
6
7
DATED: May 27, 2016
8
/s/ Lyn R. Agre______________________________
Lyn R. Agre
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES
& FRIEDMAN LLP
9
Attorneys for Defendants
THE RELATED COMPANIES, INC.,
THIRD AND MISSION ASSOCIATES, LLC, and
RELATED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.P.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
DATED: May 27, 2016
/s/ Celia McGuinness________________________
Paul L. Rein
Celia McGuinness
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN
Steven L. Derby
THE DERBY LAW FIRM P.C.
17
18
19
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PETER HOLLAND and
KRISTEN HOLLAND
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Deadlines Set in April 29, 2016 Order (Dkt. No. 65);
Case No. 4:15-CV-03220
Case 4:15-cv-03220-JSW Document 82 Filed 05/27/16 Page 4 of 5
1
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH L.R. 5-1(i)(3)
2
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that the content of this document is
3
acceptable to Celia McGuinness and Steven L. Derby, counsel for Plaintiffs, and that I have
4
obtained their authorization to affix their respective electronic signatures to this document.
5
6
7
8
9
10
DATED: May 27, 2016
/s/ Lyn R. Agre______________________________
Lyn R. Agre
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
THE RELATED COMPANIES, INC.,
THIRD AND MISSION ASSOCIATES, LLC, and
RELATED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.P.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Deadlines Set in April 29, 2016 Order (Dkt. No. 65);
Case No. 4:15-CV-03220
Case 4:15-cv-03220-JSW Document 82 Filed 05/27/16 Page 5 of 5
1
2
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ordered that the following deadlines set
forth in the April 29, 2016 Order are vacated and reset as follows:
4
Fact discovery cut-off
May 27, 2016
5
Designation of experts
June 22, 2016
6
Expert discovery cut-off
July 15, 2016
7
Hearing of dispositive motions
July 22, 2016
8
Pretrial conference
September 26, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.
Jury selection
October 26, 2016 at 8:00 a.m.
Trial
October 31, 2016 at 8:00 a.m.
9
10
11
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties shall review this Court's deadlines relating to pre-trial conferences,
including the deadlines by which they must exchange motions in limine. The Court reserves the right to
continue the pretrial conference and trial if required.
May 31, 2016
DATED: ______________________
___________________________________
Honorable Jeffery S. White
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Deadlines Set in April 29, 2016 Order (Dkt. No. 65);
Case No. 4:15-CV-03220
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?