Hilda & Alice, Inc. v. Miguel Romo et al

Filing 17

ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON PREJUDGMENT INTEREST CALCULATION RE 12 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Supplemental brief due within 14 days. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/06/15. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HILDA & ALICE, INC., Case No. 15-cv-03294-KAW Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 KRISTIAN SEGURA, Defendant. ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON PREJUDGMENT INTEREST CALCULATION Re: Dkt. No. 12 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 On November 5, 2015, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff's motion for default judgment. 14 During the hearing, Plaintiff's counsel represented that prejudgment interest was calculated based 15 on the delinquency date for the last unpaid invoice. This is not clear upon further review of 16 Plaintiff's moving papers. Mr. Bartlett's declarations indicate that interest was calculated as of 17 May 1, 2015. (See Bartlett Decl. ¶ 10, Dkt. No. 12-2; Supp. Barlett Decl. ¶ 10, Dkt. No. 15-1.) 18 Based on the statement of account provided in connection with the motion, May 1, 2015 appears 19 to correspond to the date of the first unpaid invoice, not the last unpaid invoice. (See Smith Decl. 20 ¶ 12, Ex. C, Dkt. No. 12-1.) Accordingly, Plaintiff shall provide a short supplemental brief 21 explaining its prejudgment interest calculation within 14 days of this order. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 11/06/15 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?