Hilda & Alice, Inc. v. Miguel Romo et al
Filing
17
ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON PREJUDGMENT INTEREST CALCULATION RE 12 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Supplemental brief due within 14 days. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/06/15. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
HILDA & ALICE, INC.,
Case No. 15-cv-03294-KAW
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
KRISTIAN SEGURA,
Defendant.
ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING ON PREJUDGMENT
INTEREST CALCULATION
Re: Dkt. No. 12
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
On November 5, 2015, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff's motion for default judgment.
14
During the hearing, Plaintiff's counsel represented that prejudgment interest was calculated based
15
on the delinquency date for the last unpaid invoice. This is not clear upon further review of
16
Plaintiff's moving papers. Mr. Bartlett's declarations indicate that interest was calculated as of
17
May 1, 2015. (See Bartlett Decl. ¶ 10, Dkt. No. 12-2; Supp. Barlett Decl. ¶ 10, Dkt. No. 15-1.)
18
Based on the statement of account provided in connection with the motion, May 1, 2015 appears
19
to correspond to the date of the first unpaid invoice, not the last unpaid invoice. (See Smith Decl.
20
¶ 12, Ex. C, Dkt. No. 12-1.) Accordingly, Plaintiff shall provide a short supplemental brief
21
explaining its prejudgment interest calculation within 14 days of this order.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 11/06/15
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?