Markette v. XOMA Corp et al
Filing
109
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Directing Supplemental Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (hsglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JOSEPH F. MARKETTE, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No.15-cv-03425-HSG
v.
JOHN VARIAN, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 94
12
13
The parties are directed to submit simultaneous supplemental briefs not to exceed 6 pages,
14
focusing on the impact of the Ninth Circuit’s recent opinion in City of Dearborn Heights Act 345
15
Police & Retirement Sys. v. Align Tech., Inc., No. 14-16814, 2017 WL 1753276, --- F.3d --- (9th
16
Cir. May 5, 2017). The parties should (1) discuss whether Dearborn affects the arguments they
17
have made and why; and (2) include a chart listing each allegedly false or misleading statement
18
pled in the complaint in column 1, and identifying the Dearborn standard for pleading falsity
19
applicable to each statement in column 2—i.e., material misrepresentations, opinion statements
20
with materially misleading embedded statements of fact, or statements that are false based on the
21
omission of material facts. See id. at *7. For each statement classified as an opinion statement
22
with an embedded statement of fact, the parties should identify the embedded fact.
23
The briefs must be submitted by June 9, 2017. No responsive filings are permitted.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: May 26, 2017
26
27
28
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?