Corcoran et al v. CVS Health Corporation
Filing
122
STIPULATION AND ORDER [** AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT**] re 120 Stipulation filed by Christopher Corcoran, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/29/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2016)
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Richard Lewis (pro hac vice)
Kristen Ward Broz (pro hac vice)
HAUSFELD
1700 K St. N.W., Suite 650
Washington, D.C. 20006
Tel: 202-540-7200
Fax: 202-540-7201
rlewis@hausfeld.com
kward@hausfeld.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Enu Mainigi (Pro Hac Vice)
Grant A. Geyerman (Pro Hac Vice)
Ashley W. Hardin (Pro Hac Vice)
Colleen McNamara (Pro Hac Vice)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 434-5000
Facsimile: (202) 434-5029
Attorneys for CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
25
n
onne Go
Judge Yv
ER
zalez Rog
H
24
D
RDERE
S SO O IED
IT I
DIF
AS MO
RT
23
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
22
20
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the
Proposed Class
NO
21
Edward W. Swanson (State Bar No. 159859)
August Gugelmann (State Bar No. 240544)
SWANSON & McNAMARA LLP
300 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 477-3800
Facsimile: (415) 477-9010
19
Elizabeth C. Pritzker (Cal. Bar. No.
146267)
Jonathan K. Levine (Cal. Bar. No.
220289)
Bethany L. Caracuzzo (Cal. Bar. No.
190687)
PRITZKER LEVINE LLP
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1390
Oakland, California 94612
Tel. 415-692-0772
Fax. 415-366-6110
ecp@pritzkerlevine.com
jkl@pritzkerlevine.com
bc@pritzkerlevine.com
R NIA
6
ers
FO
5
LI
4
A
3
Pat A. Cipollone, P.C. (pro hac vice)
Rebecca R. Anzidei (pro hac vice)
Robert B. Gilmore (pro hac vice)
STEIN MITCHELL MUSE
CIPOLLONE & BEATO LLP
1100 Connecticut Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
Tel: (202) 737-7777
pcipollone@steinmitchell.com
ranzidei@steinmitchell.com
rgilmore@steinmitchell.com
S
2
Michael P. Lehmann (Cal. Bar. No. 77152)
Christopher L. Lebsock (Cal. Bar No. 184546)
Bonny E. Sweeney (Cal. Bar. No. 176174)
HAUSFELD
600 Montgomery St., Suite 3200
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel: 415-633-1908
Fax: 415-358-4980
mlehmann@hausfeld.com
clebsock@hausfeld.com
bsweeney@hausfeld.com
UNIT
ED
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
26
27
JOINT STIPULATION RE: PRODUCTION OF NATIONWIDE TRANSACTION DATA
C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
OAKLAND DIVISION
3
4
CHRISTOPHER CORCORAN, et al.,
5
6
7
No. 15-CV-03504-YGR
Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION REGARDING
DEFENDANT CVS PHARMACY, INC.’S
PRODUCTION OF NATIONWIDE
TRANSACTION DATA
v.
CVS PHARMACY, INC.,
8
Defendant.
9
10
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Case Management and Pretrial Order filed on
11
December 9, 2015 [Dkt. No. 62], Plaintiffs must file their motion for class certification by
12
August 2, 2016; defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (“CVS”) must file its opposition by September
13
20, 2016; and Plaintiffs must file their Reply by November 8, 2016;
14
WHEREAS the Court’s hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is
15
currently scheduled for December 6, 2016;
16
WHEREAS, on February 5, 2016, CVS produced to Plaintiffs transaction data
17
reflecting purchases of drugs on CVS’s Health Savings Pass (“HSP”) program in 12 states and
18
the District of Columbia, reflecting the states in which at least one named plaintiff resides or
19
has filled a prescription for an HSP-eligible medication at a CVS pharmacy;
20
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs will seek to certify a class on a nationwide basis in
21
addition to state-specific subclasses;
22
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2016, the parties filed a Discovery Dispute Letter
23
Brief regarding Plaintiffs’ motion to compel CVS to produce transaction data from the
24
remaining states where CVS has retail pharmacy stores (the “Nationwide Data”);
25
WHEREAS, on June 22, 2016, the Court held a discovery hearing regarding
26
the Nationwide Data;
27
-2-
Case No.: 3:15-cv-03504
JOINT STIPULATION RE: PRODUCTION OF NATIONWIDE TRANSACTION DATA
1
WHEREAS, at that hearing, the Court offered CVS the choice of deferring a
2
ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion to compel until after receiving the Court’s ruling on its pending
3
motion to dismiss, thereby suspending indefinitely Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their motion for
4
class certification, or producing the Nationwide Data now;
5
WHEREAS, on June 23, 2016, the Court instructed the parties to inform the
6
Court regarding a stipulation as to their agreed-upon schedule for CVS’s production of the
7
Nationwide Data and the briefing deadlines for Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification;
8
WHEREAS, CVS informed Plaintiffs, on June 23, 2016, that they would need
9
through the better part of August to produce the Nationwide Data, and in order to have certain
10
11
12
deadlines;
NOW THEREFORE, ALL PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR
UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL hereby stipulate as follows:
13
(1)
CVS will produce the Nationwide Data by August 26, 2016;
14
(2)
Plaintiffs will file their motion for class certification by October 3, 2016;
15
(3)
CVS will file its opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification
16
by November 21, 2016;
17
(4)
18
certification by January 9, 2017;
19
(5)
20
21
22
23
Plaintiffs will file their reply in support of their motion for class
The parties await the Court’s instruction regarding a new hearing date
for Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR
CLASS CERTIFICATION IS CONTINUED TO
SO STIPULATED.
TUESDAY, JANUARY 31, 2017 ON THE
COURT'S 2:00 P.M. CALENDAR.
Date: June 23, 2016
24
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
25
By:
26
/s/ Grant A. Geyerman
Grant A. Geyerman
27
-3-
Case No.: 3:15-cv-03504
JOINT STIPULATION RE: PRODUCTION OF NATIONWIDE TRANSACTION DATA
Attorney for Defendant CVS Pharmacy,
Inc.
1
2
3
4
STEIN MITCHELL MUSE
CIPOLLONE & BEATO LLP
5
6
By:
7
/s/ Robert B. Gilmore
Robert B. Gilmore
Attorney for Plaintiffs
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
-4-
Case No.: 3:15-cv-03504
JOINT STIPULATION RE: PRODUCTION OF NATIONWIDE TRANSACTION DATA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?