Corcoran et al v. CVS Health Corporation
Filing
298
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 275 Administrative Motion for Leave to Disclose Two Experts. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2017)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
CHRISTOPHER CORCORAN, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
7
8
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISCLOSE TWO
EXPERTS
vs.
9
CVS HEALTH, ET AL.,
10
Defendants.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
CASE NO. 15-cv-03504-YGR
Re: Dkt. No. 275
On June 6, 2017, in conjunction with their renewed motion for class certification, plaintiffs
12
filed an administrative motion for leave to disclose two additional experts. (Dkt. No. 275.)
13
Defendants oppose. (Dkt. No. 290.) The Court finds no good cause has been shown to extend the
14
deadlines for expert disclosure of these two witnesses.
15
Fact and expert discovery in this action has been closed since February 27, 2017. (Dkt.
16
No. 62.) The Court issued its order denying plaintiffs’ initial motion for class certification on
17
March 21, 2017. (Dkt. No. 249.) The parties appeared before the Court for a case management
18
conference on May 1, 2017, during which the Court set a briefing schedule for plaintiff’s renewed
19
motion for class certification and defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 263.)
20
Additionally, the Court specified that there would be no new discovery for the purposes of such
21
motions. (Dkt. No. 267 at 11.) Yet, plaintiffs only sought permission to submit additional expert
22
declarations on the date the motions for class certification and summary judgment were due.
23
Accordingly, the Court DENIES plaintiffs’ motion for leave to disclose the same.
24
This Order terminates Docket Number 275.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: June 15, 2017
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?