Corcoran et al v. CVS Health Corporation

Filing 422

ORDER [*AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT*] GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION re 420 Stipulation filed by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. Trial shall begin on Monday, August 10, 2020. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/18/2020. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2020)

Download PDF
CHRISTOPHER CORCORAN, et al., 7 Plaintiffs, 8 9 12 2/18/2020 No. 15-CV-03504-YGR CLASS ACTION N D IS T IC T R *As Modified by the Court* CVS PHARMACY, INC., Defendant. WHEREAS, on August 23, 2019, the Court set a trial date in this matter for April 20, 2020 (Dkt. No. 371); 13 WHEREAS, on February 6, 2020, Defense counsel advised the Court and Plaintiffs of 14 an unavoidable conflict with the April 20 trial date that lead counsel has with a trial in In re 15 Opioid Litigation, Index No. 400000/2017 (Suffolk Cnty, NY) starting March 20, 2020; 16 17 18 19 20 21 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs do not oppose moving the April 20 trial setting to another date that is mutually convenient for Plaintiffs, Defendant, and the Court; WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed that a new trial date of Monday, August 10, 2020, is mutually convenient, provided that date remains acceptable to the Court. NOW THEREFORE, ALL PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: 22 1. Trial shall begin on Monday, August 10, 2020. 23 2. Within 10 days, the parties will submit for Court approval a proposed schedule 24 of new pretrial dates (e.g., exchanging motions in limine, exhibits, and deposition designations; 25 filing the pretrial conference statement; holding a pretrial conference), to both identify the 26 new deadlines and ensure the parties make productive use of the extra time until trial. 27 However, the parties understand that the Court is unavailable for oral argument or hearing during the month of June 2020. JOINT STIPULATION RE TRIAL DATE R NIA o ge r s LI ER onzalez R JOINT STIPULATION RE TRIAL DATE v. 10 11 onne G Judge Yv H 6 RT OAKLAND DIVISION 5 NO NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 TED GRAN FO S 2 UNIT ED [Submitting counsel appear on additional pages] RT U O 1 ISTRIC ES D TC T TA OF C 1 DATED: February 18, 2020 Respectfully Submitted, 2 By: /s/ Enu Mainigi 3 Enu Mainigi (Pro Hac Vice) Grant A. Geyerman (Pro Hac Vice) WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 725 Twelfth Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 434-5000 Facsimile: (202) 434-5029 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Edward W. Swanson (State Bar No. 159859) August Gugelmann (State Bar No. 240544) SWANSON & McNAMARA LLP 300 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 477-3800 Facsimile: (415) 477-9010 Attorneys for CVS Pharmacy, Inc. 12 13 By: /s/ Bonny E. Sweeney 14 Bonny E. Sweeney (Cal. Bar. No. 176174) HAUSFELD 600 Montgomery St., Suite 3200 San Francisco, California 94111 Tel: 415-633-1908 Fax: 415-358-4980 bsweeney@hausfeld.com 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Richard Lewis (pro hac vice) HAUSFELD 1700 K St. N.W., Suite 650 Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel: 202-540-7200 Fax: 202-540-7201 rlewis@hausfeld.com Robert B. Gilmore (pro hac vice) STEIN MITCHELL BEATO & MISSNER LLP 1100 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 rgilmore@steinmitchell.com 25 26 Elizabeth C. Pritzker (Cal. Bar. No. 146267) Jonathan K. Levine (Cal. Bar. No. 27 -2JOINT STIPULATION RE TRIAL DATE Case No.: 15-CV-03504-YGR 1 2 3 4 220289) PRITZKER LEVINE LLP 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1390 Oakland, California 94612 Tel. 415-692-0772 Fax. 415-366-6110 ecp@pritzkerlevine.com jkl@pritzkerlevine.com 5 6 7 8 9 ATTESTATION I, Grant A. Geyerman, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this document. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all other signatories listed have concurred in this filing. __/s/ Grant A. Geyerman___ Grant A. Geyerman 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 -3JOINT STIPULATION RE TRIAL DATE Case No.: 15-CV-03504-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?