Corcoran et al v. CVS Health Corporation
Filing
422
ORDER [*AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT*] GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION re 420 Stipulation filed by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. Trial shall begin on Monday, August 10, 2020. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/18/2020. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2020)
CHRISTOPHER CORCORAN, et al.,
7
Plaintiffs,
8
9
12
2/18/2020
No. 15-CV-03504-YGR
CLASS ACTION
N
D IS T IC T
R
*As Modified by the Court*
CVS PHARMACY, INC.,
Defendant.
WHEREAS, on August 23, 2019, the Court set a trial date in this matter for April 20,
2020 (Dkt. No. 371);
13
WHEREAS, on February 6, 2020, Defense counsel advised the Court and Plaintiffs of
14
an unavoidable conflict with the April 20 trial date that lead counsel has with a trial in In re
15
Opioid Litigation, Index No. 400000/2017 (Suffolk Cnty, NY) starting March 20, 2020;
16
17
18
19
20
21
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs do not oppose moving the April 20 trial setting to another date
that is mutually convenient for Plaintiffs, Defendant, and the Court;
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed that a new trial date of Monday,
August 10, 2020, is mutually convenient, provided that date remains acceptable to the Court.
NOW
THEREFORE,
ALL
PARTIES,
BY
AND
THROUGH
THEIR
UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL HEREBY STIPULATE THAT:
22
1.
Trial shall begin on Monday, August 10, 2020.
23
2.
Within 10 days, the parties will submit for Court approval a proposed schedule
24
of new pretrial dates (e.g., exchanging motions in limine, exhibits, and deposition designations;
25
filing the pretrial conference statement; holding a pretrial conference), to both identify the
26
new deadlines and ensure the parties make productive use of the extra time until trial.
27
However, the parties understand that the Court is unavailable for oral argument or hearing
during the month of June 2020.
JOINT STIPULATION RE TRIAL DATE
R NIA
o ge r s
LI
ER
onzalez R
JOINT STIPULATION RE TRIAL DATE
v.
10
11
onne G
Judge Yv
H
6
RT
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
NO
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
A
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
TED
GRAN
FO
S
2
UNIT
ED
[Submitting counsel appear on additional pages]
RT
U
O
1
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA
OF
C
1
DATED: February 18, 2020
Respectfully Submitted,
2
By: /s/ Enu Mainigi
3
Enu Mainigi (Pro Hac Vice)
Grant A. Geyerman (Pro Hac Vice)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 434-5000
Facsimile: (202) 434-5029
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Edward W. Swanson (State Bar No. 159859)
August Gugelmann (State Bar No. 240544)
SWANSON & McNAMARA LLP
300 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 477-3800
Facsimile: (415) 477-9010
Attorneys for CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
12
13
By: /s/ Bonny E. Sweeney
14
Bonny E. Sweeney (Cal. Bar. No. 176174)
HAUSFELD
600 Montgomery St., Suite 3200
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel: 415-633-1908
Fax: 415-358-4980
bsweeney@hausfeld.com
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Richard Lewis (pro hac vice)
HAUSFELD
1700 K St. N.W., Suite 650
Washington, D.C. 20006
Tel: 202-540-7200
Fax: 202-540-7201
rlewis@hausfeld.com
Robert B. Gilmore (pro hac vice)
STEIN MITCHELL
BEATO & MISSNER LLP
1100 Connecticut Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
rgilmore@steinmitchell.com
25
26
Elizabeth C. Pritzker (Cal. Bar. No.
146267)
Jonathan K. Levine (Cal. Bar. No.
27
-2JOINT STIPULATION RE TRIAL DATE
Case No.: 15-CV-03504-YGR
1
2
3
4
220289)
PRITZKER LEVINE LLP
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1390
Oakland, California 94612
Tel. 415-692-0772
Fax. 415-366-6110
ecp@pritzkerlevine.com
jkl@pritzkerlevine.com
5
6
7
8
9
ATTESTATION
I, Grant A. Geyerman, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file
this document. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all other
signatories listed have concurred in this filing.
__/s/ Grant A. Geyerman___
Grant A. Geyerman
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
-3JOINT STIPULATION RE TRIAL DATE
Case No.: 15-CV-03504-YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?