Flores v. Alameda County Sheriff's Department

Filing 20

ORDER vacating 1/26/2016 Case Management Conference. Amended Pleadings due by 3/25/2016. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 1/20/2016. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHRISTOPHER ROBERT FLORES, Case No. 15-cv-03515-KAW Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ORDER VACATING 1/26/16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER SETTING DEADLINE TO AMEND COMPLAINT Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendant. 12 On July 30, 2015, Plaintiff Christopher Robert Flores filed a lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 13 § 1983 against Defendant County of Alameda and Does 1-10, alleging that, following his arrest on 14 or about July 6, 2015, he was transported to Santa Rita Jail, where he informed two Sheriff’s 15 Deputies that he had a seizure condition that required twice daily medication, but was told that 16 there was no nurse on duty. Plaintiff claims that, despite making numerous requests, he was not 17 provided anti-seizure medication until he suffered a grand mal seizure while in custody. 18 On December 9, 2015, the County of Alameda was dismissed with prejudice. The 19 remaining defendants are unidentified Doe Sheriff’s Deputies at Santa Rita Jail. As the remaining 20 defendants are not identified, the Court VACATES the January 26, 2016 case management 21 conference. Further, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before March 25, 2016, in 22 which he identifies one or more Doe Defendants. Failure to amend by that date—or file an 23 administrative motion from relief from the deadline—may result in the case being dismissed for 24 failure to prosecute. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 20, 2016 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?