Greenfield v. Criterion Capital Management, LLC et al

Filing 36

ORDER re 32 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 11/20/2015. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

STACEY GREENFIELD,

9
10
11

Case No. 15-cv-3583-PJH

Plaintiff,

8
v.

ORDER

CRITERION CAPITAL MANAGEMENT,
LLC, et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13
14

On November 19, 2015, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint,

15

noticed for hearing on January 20, 2016. The court previously approved a stipulated

16

briefing schedule that set the date for the filing of the opposition and reply on December

17

23, 2015, and January 14, 2015, respectively. While the approved stipulation also

18

provided for a hearing date “no earlier than January 20, 2016,” six days is an insufficient

19

amount of time for the court to review the parties’ papers and prepare for the hearing.

20

The Civil Local Rules of this court provide for a minimum of 14 days between the filing of

21

the reply brief and the hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-2. Accordingly, defendants shall renotice

22

the hearing for a date no earlier than February 3, 2016.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: November 20, 2015

26
27
28

__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge