Mueller v. Rite Aid Corporation et al

Filing 24

CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER, ORDER REFERRING CASE to ADR for Court Mediation to be completed by 3/31/16. Case Management Statement due by 4/18/2016. Non-Expert Discovery due by 9/2/2016. Case Management Conference set for 4/25/2016 02:00 P M in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Selection set for 1/9/2017 08:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. 3-5 Day Jury Trial set for 1/9/2017 08:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Dispositive Motion Hearing set for 10/4/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Pretrial Conference set for Wednesday, 12/21/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon . Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Compliance Hearing is set for Wednesday, 11/23/2016 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/18/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 RICHARD MUELLER, 4 Case No. 15-cv-03595-YGR Plaintiff, 5 v. SCHEDULING AND PRETRIAL ORDER 6 RITE AID CORPORATION, 7 Defendant. 8 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 9 The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates: 10 PRETRIAL SCHEDULE United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Monday, April 25, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. 13 REFERRED TO ADR TO BE COMPLETED BY: March 31, 2016 14 LAST DAY TO JOIN PARTIES OR AMEND PLEADINGS: Only with Court approval 15 NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: September 2, 2016 17 DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED): Opening: August 1, 2016 Rebuttal: August 12, 2016 18 EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: September 2, 2016 19 October 4, 2016 20 DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 / DAUBERT MOTIONS To BE HEARD BY: 21 COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2) Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 9:01 a.m. JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT: December 2, 2016 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH: Monday, January 9, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. for 35 days 16 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary judgment. (Jury Trial) 1 2 Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall meet 3 and confer at least twenty-one (21) days in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance 4 hearing on Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have 5 reviewed the Court’s Pretrial Setting Instructions and are in compliance therewith. The 6 compliance hearing shall be held in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, 7 California, in Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the 8 parties shall file a one-page JOINT STATEMENT confirming they have complied with this 9 requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may 12 result in sanctions. 13 14 15 As set forth above, and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation (Dkt. No. 16), the parties are REFERRED to Court mediation to be completed by March 31, 2016. The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing 16 Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All 17 Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders. 18 This Order terminates Docket Number 16. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: December 18, 2015 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 cc: ADR 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?