Mueller v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
Filing
24
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER, ORDER REFERRING CASE to ADR for Court Mediation to be completed by 3/31/16. Case Management Statement due by 4/18/2016. Non-Expert Discovery due by 9/2/2016. Case Management Conference set for 4/25/2016 02:00 P M in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Selection set for 1/9/2017 08:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. 3-5 Day Jury Trial set for 1/9/2017 08:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Dispositive Motion Hearing set for 10/4/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Pretrial Conference set for Wednesday, 12/21/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon . Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Compliance Hearing is set for Wednesday, 11/23/2016 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/18/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
RICHARD MUELLER,
4
Case No. 15-cv-03595-YGR
Plaintiff,
5
v.
SCHEDULING AND PRETRIAL
ORDER
6
RITE AID CORPORATION,
7
Defendant.
8
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
9
The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates:
10
PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE:
Monday, April 25, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.
13
REFERRED TO ADR TO BE COMPLETED BY:
March 31, 2016
14
LAST DAY TO JOIN PARTIES OR AMEND PLEADINGS:
Only with Court approval
15
NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:
September 2, 2016
17
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED):
Opening: August 1, 2016
Rebuttal: August 12, 2016
18
EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:
September 2, 2016
19
October 4, 2016
20
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 / DAUBERT MOTIONS To BE
HEARD BY:
21
COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2)
Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 9:01
a.m.
JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT:
December 2, 2016
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:
Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 9:00
a.m.
TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH:
Monday, January 9, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. for 35 days
16
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
28
See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary
judgment.
(Jury Trial)
1
2
Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall meet
3
and confer at least twenty-one (21) days in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance
4
hearing on Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have
5
reviewed the Court’s Pretrial Setting Instructions and are in compliance therewith. The
6
compliance hearing shall be held in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland,
7
California, in Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the
8
parties shall file a one-page JOINT STATEMENT confirming they have complied with this
9
requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not
appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may
12
result in sanctions.
13
14
15
As set forth above, and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation (Dkt. No. 16), the parties are
REFERRED to Court mediation to be completed by March 31, 2016.
The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing
16
Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All
17
Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.
18
This Order terminates Docket Number 16.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
Dated: December 18, 2015
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
cc: ADR
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?