Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. v. Methode Electronics, Inc.
Filing
43
ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Dismiss.(pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016)
1
2
UNITED STATES D
DISTRICT C
COURT
3
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CAL
N
RN
CT
LIFORNIA
4
5
MELLANOX TECHNOL
M
LOGIES, LT
TD.,
7
8
9
Case No. 15-cv-3730
0-PJH
Plaintiff,
6
v.
ORDER G
GRANTING IN PART A
G
AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION T
G
TO
DISMISS
METHODE ELECTRON
M
E
NICS, INC.,
Defendant.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Defend
dant’s motio to dismis came on for hearing before this court on March 2,
on
ss
n
12
2016. Plaintif Mellanox Technolog
ff
gies, Ltd. (“p
plaintiff”) ap
ppeared thr
rough its co
ounsel,
13
Xa
avier Brandw
wajn. Defe
endant Meth
hode Electr
ronics, Inc. (“defendan appeare through
nt”)
ed
14
its counsel, David Newm
D
man. Having read the papers filed in conjunction with the motion
d
15
and carefully considered the argum
d
ments and th relevant legal autho
he
t
ority, and g
good cause
16
appearing, the court here GRANT in part a DENIE in part de
e
eby
TS
and
ES
efendant’s motion,
17
wit leave to amend, as stated at th hearing.
th
a
he
18
The mo
otion is DENIED to the extent tha it seeks d
e
at
dismissal of plaintiff’s d
f
direct
19
infr
ringement allegations, but GRAN
a
,
NTED with leave to am
mend to the extent that it seeks
t
20
dis
smissal of plaintiff’s ind
p
direct infring
gement alle
egations. A amende complaint must
Any
ed
21
spe
ecifically allege facts regarding each elemen of induce infringem
r
e
nt
ed
ment and co
ontributory
22
infr
ringement. Plaintiff sh have un March 2 2016 to file a seco amende
hall
ntil
23,
o
ond
ed
23
complaint in accordance with this order. Defe
a
e
o
endant shall have 21 days thereaf to
l
fter
24
answer or oth
herwise respond to the complaint .
e
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: March 4, 2016
h
__
__________
__________
__________
_______
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?