Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. v. Methode Electronics, Inc.

Filing 94

ORDER by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton denying 89 Motion to Shorten Time; granting 90 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2016)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

MELLANOX TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,

7
8
9

Case No. 15-cv-03730-PJH

Plaintiff,

6
v.

METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC.,
Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED
DOCUMENTS AND DENYING MOTION
TO SHORTEN TIME
Re: Dkt. Nos. 89, 90

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Before the court are defendant Methode Electronics, Inc.’s (“Methode”)

13

administrative motions to remove incorrectly filed documents from ECF (Dkt. 90) and to

14

shorten time for its pending motion for leave to amend the joint claim construction

15

statement (Dkt. 89).

16

The motion to remove incorrectly filed documents is GRANTED. The motion is not

17

opposed, and the documents—Dkt. Nos. 80-2, 80-8, 80-9—were filed in conjunction with

18

a motion that was subsequently withdrawn. The court ORDERS that these documents

19

shall be permanently removed from ECF.

20

The motion to shorten time is DENIED. Methode has not established the

21

substantial harm or prejudice required under the local rules. See L.R. 6-3(a)(3).

22

Methode’s motion to leave to amend will be heard according to the usual briefing

23

schedule and the noticed hearing date of October 19.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: September 14, 2016

26
27
28

_________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge