Monica Sud v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Filing
66
ORDER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL BRIEFING AND VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/14/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT
5
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA
6
7
MONICA SU
M
UD,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 1
15-cv-03783
3-JSW
ORDER R
REQUIRING ADDITIO
G
ONAL
BRIEFING AND VAC
G
CATING H
HEARING
v.
COSTCO WH
HOLESALE CORPORA
E
ATION,
et al.,
t
Re: Docket No. 38, 39, 47
t
,
Defendants
s.
12
13
This ma
atter is sched
duled for a hearing on D
h
December 18, 2015, to co
onsider the m
motions to
14
dis
smiss filed by Defendant The Cour finds that the motions are suitable for disposit
y
ts.
rt
e
tion without
15
ora argument, but it also finds that add
al
fi
ditional brief
fing on the f
following qu
uestion is wa
arranted.
16
Ac
ccordingly, th Court VA
he
ACATES the hearing sch
e
heduled for D
December 18 2015. Pla
8,
aintiff is
17
HE
EREBY ORD
DERED to file a respons to the follo
fi
se
owing quest
tion by no la than Dec
ater
cember 21,
18
201 If the Co determi
15:
ourt
ines that the motions to d
dismiss for l
lack of Artic III and sta
cle
atutory
19
standing can be resolved on the existin record and that those m
e
n
ng
d
motions sho that Plain lacks
ow
ntiff
20
standing, what facts, if any could Plain include in an amend complai to demon
y,
ntiff
e
ded
int
nstrate that
21
she has standin to pursue these claims Unless th Court dete
e
ng
s?
he
ermines a response from Defendants
m
s
22
is necessary, th matter sha be deeme submitted upon filing of Plaintiff’ response, and the
n
he
all
ed
d
’s
23
Court will issue an Order in due course
n
e.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: Decemb 14, 2015
ber
5
__
___________
__________
____
JE
EFFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?