Monica Sud v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al

Filing 66

ORDER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL BRIEFING AND VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/14/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES D D DISTRICT C COURT 5 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI RN CT IFORNIA 6 7 MONICA SU M UD, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 1 15-cv-03783 3-JSW ORDER R REQUIRING ADDITIO G ONAL BRIEFING AND VAC G CATING H HEARING v. COSTCO WH HOLESALE CORPORA E ATION, et al., t Re: Docket No. 38, 39, 47 t , Defendants s. 12 13 This ma atter is sched duled for a hearing on D h December 18, 2015, to co onsider the m motions to 14 dis smiss filed by Defendant The Cour finds that the motions are suitable for disposit y ts. rt e tion without 15 ora argument, but it also finds that add al fi ditional brief fing on the f following qu uestion is wa arranted. 16 Ac ccordingly, th Court VA he ACATES the hearing sch e heduled for D December 18 2015. Pla 8, aintiff is 17 HE EREBY ORD DERED to file a respons to the follo fi se owing quest tion by no la than Dec ater cember 21, 18 201 If the Co determi 15: ourt ines that the motions to d dismiss for l lack of Artic III and sta cle atutory 19 standing can be resolved on the existin record and that those m e n ng d motions sho that Plain lacks ow ntiff 20 standing, what facts, if any could Plain include in an amend complai to demon y, ntiff e ded int nstrate that 21 she has standin to pursue these claims Unless th Court dete e ng s? he ermines a response from Defendants m s 22 is necessary, th matter sha be deeme submitted upon filing of Plaintiff’ response, and the n he all ed d ’s 23 Court will issue an Order in due course n e. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. Da ated: Decemb 14, 2015 ber 5 __ ___________ __________ ____ JE EFFREY S. W WHITE Un nited States D District Judg ge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?