Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. CB Equities, LLC,
Filing
67
ORDER to Submit Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion for Default Judgment re 40 MOTION for Default Judgment, 59 Supplemental Brief, filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 05/02/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No. 15-cv-03809-DMR
ORDER TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
v.
CB EQUITIES, LLC, et al.,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 40, 59
Defendants.
On February 25, 2016, Plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture
13
Trustee for American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2007-1 (“Deutsche Bank” or “Plaintiff”)
14
filed a motion for default judgment. [Docket No. 40.] Plaintiff seeks to cancel, extinguish or void
15
a stipulated judgment entered by this court on November 26, 2012 in the case of CB Equities, LLC
16
v. American Brokers Conduit Corporation, case number 12-cv-5449, later recorded in the Official
17
Records of Contra Costa County on November 29, 2012 against the property located at 223 Verde
18
Mesa, Danville, California. The court reviewed the Motion for Default Judgment ordered Plaintiff
19
to submit supplemental briefing. [Docket No. 56.] On April 13, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted
20
supplemental briefing in support of its motion. [Docket No. 59.]
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [Docket No. 40] and its Supplemental Brief in
Support of the Motion for Default Judgment [Docket No. 59] provide no analysis regarding the
appropriateness of Plaintiff’s requested relief that the court issue a declaration and order that the
stipulated judgment entered in CB Equities, LLC v. American Brokers Conduit Corporation, case
number 12-cv-5449, was void ab initio and of no force or effect. Plaintiff did not provide an
analysis of its entitlement to the requested relief and, in particular, did not address the issue of
whether a declaration that the stipulated judgment is void, as opposed to voidable, is the
appropriate remedy in this case. See Mot. for Default Judgment; Supp. Br. at 9.
1
Plaintiff shall submit additional briefing by 9:00 a.m. on May 6, 2016, to address the
2
deficiency in the motion for default judgment. Plaintiff shall include citations supporting its
3
requested relief (a declaration that the stipulated judgment is void). Plaintiff shall provide
4
citations to cases that are factually similar, preferably within the Ninth Circuit.
5
Any opposition or statement of non-opposition is due no later than May 7, 2016.
6
Immediately upon receipt of this Order, Plaintiff shall serve Defendant with a copy of
7
this Order and file a proof of service with the court.
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 2, 2016
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?