Jen v. City and County of San Francisco et al
ORDER DENYING 99 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; VACATING hearing date; SETTING briefing schedule. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 7/24/2017. (hsglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KAIMIN JIMMY JEN,
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-03834-HSG
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME; VACATING
HEARING DATE; SETTING BRIEFING
Re: Dkt. No. 99
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Having reviewed Plaintiff Kaimin Jimmy Jen’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for, among other
things, an extension of time to respond to Defendant City and County of San Francisco’s
(“Defendant”) motion for summary judgment, the Court DENIES the motion, TAKES
Defendant’s pending motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment under submission, and
VACATES the hearing date previously scheduled for Thursday, August 3, 2017. However, the
Court will allow Mr. Jen to file oppositions to Defendant’s pending motions no later than August
4, 2017, if Plaintiff chooses to do so. Any reply to Plaintiff’s oppositions will be due by August
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?