Jen v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 105

ORDER DENYING 99 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; VACATING hearing date; SETTING briefing schedule. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 7/24/2017. (hsglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KAIMIN JIMMY JEN, 8 Plaintiff, v. 9 10 11 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Case No. 15-cv-03834-HSG ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; VACATING HEARING DATE; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Re: Dkt. No. 99 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 Having reviewed Plaintiff Kaimin Jimmy Jen’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for, among other 14 things, an extension of time to respond to Defendant City and County of San Francisco’s 15 (“Defendant”) motion for summary judgment, the Court DENIES the motion, TAKES 16 Defendant’s pending motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment under submission, and 17 VACATES the hearing date previously scheduled for Thursday, August 3, 2017. However, the 18 Court will allow Mr. Jen to file oppositions to Defendant’s pending motions no later than August 19 4, 2017, if Plaintiff chooses to do so. Any reply to Plaintiff’s oppositions will be due by August 20 11, 2017. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 7/24/2017 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?