Knaus et al v. The Boeing Company
Filing
108
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting (670) Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice in case 4:13-md-02497-YGR and in individual case 4:15-cv-3916-YGR. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Lewis S. Eidson, Esq.
mike@colson.com
Enid Duany Mendoza, Esq.
enid@colson.com
COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.
255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
Tel: (305) 476-7400
Facsimile: (305) 476-7444
Monica Kelly, Esq.
monicakelly@ribbecklaw.com
RIBBECK LAW CHARTERED
Lake Point Tower
505 North Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60611
Tel: (312) 822-9999
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
12
-
and –
13
ALL PARTIES LISTED IN THE SIGNATURE PAGE
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
IN RE: AIR CRASH AT SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA ON JULY 6, 2013
18
19
20
This document relates to
Case No. 4:15-cv-03916-YGR
21
CARL KNAUS et al,
22
23
Plaintiffs,
vs.
24
THE BOEING COMPANY,
25
26
27
28
Defendant.
MDL No. 2497
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
1
Defendant The Boeing Company and the Plaintiffs listed below, in their individual and/or
2
in their representative capacity, through undersigned counsel hereby give notice that the
3
Plaintiffs set forth below have settled their claims and request that the below referenced
4
Plaintiffs be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)
5
(1), with each party to bear his, her or its own costs and attorney’s fees.
6
7
8
9
The adult Plaintiffs dismissing their claims in their individual capacities are the
following:
1. Se Lee
2. Yiying Hou
10
3. Jingxia Kang
11
4. Hongqin Li
12
5. Tieshan Xi
13
The settlement of the claims of the following minors having received Court approval are
14
15
being dismissed by their parents and next friends:
16
1. Dongliang Li on behalf of his minor child H.L.
17
2. Jie Zhang on behalf of her minor child Z.L.
18
3. Miao Luo on behalf of his minor child S.L.
19
4. Lijun Wu on behalf of his minor child Y.W.
20
21
5. Haijun Xu on behalf of his minor child Q.X.
22
6. Jiahui Tang on behalf of her minor child J.Y
23
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
24
I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
25
of Dismissal With Prejudice has been obtained from the other Signatories.
26
27
28
MDL No. 2497 Case No. 4:15-cv-03916-YGR
Joint Stipulation And [Proposed] Order of Dismissal With Prejudice
2
1
DATED: August __, 2016
2
COLSON HICKS EIDSON
By:
3
/S/
ENID DUANY MENDOZA
8
LEWIS S. EIDSON, ESQ.
mike@colson.com
ENID DUANY MENDOZA, ESQ.
enid@colson.com
COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.
255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
Tel: (305) 476-7400
Fax: (305) 476-7444
9
and
4
5
6
7
10
MONICA KELLY, ESQ.
monicakelly@ribbecklaw.com
RIBBECK LAW CHARTERED
Lake Point Tower
505 North Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60611
Tel: (312) 822-9999
11
12
13
14
Attorneys for the Plaintiffs
15
16
DATED: August ___, 2016
PERKINS COIE LLP
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
By: /s/ Daniel E. Lassen
Daniel E. Lassen, California Bar No. 271446
DanLassen@perkinscoie.com
and
John D. Dillow, California Bar No. 50403
JDillow@perkinscoie.com
Bruce D. Campbell, Washington Bar No. 8629
BCampbell@perkinscoie.com
Michael E. Scoville, Washington Bar No. 44913
MScoville@perkinscoie.com
Attorneys for Defendant
The Boeing Company
26
27
28
MDL No. 2497 Case No. 4:15-cv-03916-YGR
Joint Stipulation And [Proposed] Order of Dismissal With Prejudice
3
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the claims of the
3
Plaintiffs listed above in Case No 4:15-cv-03916-YGR, which is part of the MDL, are hereby
4
dismissed with prejudice.
5
6
7
August 17
DATED: _____________________, 2016
________________________________
8
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
9
U.S. District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
LAOFFICE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MDL No. 2497 Case No. 4:15-cv-03916-YGR
Joint Stipulation And [Proposed] Order of Dismissal With Prejudice
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?