Knaus et al v. The Boeing Company
Filing
88
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF MIAO LUO AND YI QUIN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF MINOR'S COMPROMISE re (596 in 4:13-md-02497-YGR) MOTION for Approval of Minor's Compromise filed by Miao Luo. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/2/2016. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Lewis S. Eidson, Esq.
mike@colson.com
Enid Duany Mendoza, Esq.
enid@colson.com
COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.
255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
Tel: (305) 476-7400
Facsimile: (305) 476-7444
Monica Kelly, Esq.
monicakelly@ribbecklaw.com
RIBBECK LAW CHARTERED
Lake Point Tower
505 North Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60611
Tel: (312) 822-9999
11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
IN RE: AIR CRASH AT SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA ON JULY 6, 2013
MDL No. 2497
Ther document relates to
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF MIAO LUO AND YI QIN’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR APPROVAL
OF MINOR’S COMPROMISE
17
18
19
Case No. 4:15-CV-03916-YGR
20
21
22
CARL KNAUS et al,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
23
THE BOEING COMPANY,
24
25
26
27
28
Defendant.
1
Plaintiffs Miao Luo and Yi Qin, as natural parents of S.L. and as Next Friends of S.L., by
2
and through their counsel, have submitted their Unopposed Motion for Approval of Minor’s
3
Compromise pertaining to a settlement reached with all parties on behalf of S.L.
4
Upon review of the file and consideration of the materials submitted in support thereof,
5
including the Motion, the Declaration of Enid Duany Mendoza, the revised Report of Next
6
Friends, the revised Declarations of Miao Luo and Yi Qin, and the non-opposition of any of the
7
released parties provided to the Court prior to the making of this Order, the Court does hereby
8
find and order as follows:
9
10
1.
The settlement of the claim of plaintiff S.L. against all parties, as compromised
11
pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement and General Release (Exhibit A to the
12
Declaration of Enid Duany Mendoza) is approved.
13
14
2.
Asiana's Aviation Hull and liability insurers and reinsurers subscribing to the
policies in effect on July 6, 2013, shall issue payment in the amount of _______________ made
15
payable to MetLife Tower Resources Group, Inc. and delivered to NFP Structured Settlements,
16
as broker of record, to be received within 30 (thirty) days of Court Approval.
17
18
3.
MetLife Tower Resources Group, Inc. shall fund the Periodic Payment(S) by
19
purchasing a “qualified funding asset” within the meaning of Section 130(d) of the Internal
20
Revenue Code of 1986 in the form of an annuity contract issued by Metropolitan Life Insurance
21
Company in the sum of ______________ for the benefit of S.L. that shall provide a
22
____________ guaranteed lump sum payable ________________ to S.L.
23
4.
If S.L. predeceases any Periodic Payment(s), the beneficiary of the Periodic
24
25
26
27
28
Payment(s) shall be the surviving parent(s) or legal guardian(s) of S.L.
5.
S.L., by and through his parent(s) and legal guardian(s), agrees to provide the
Foreign Wire Form required by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company for electronic deposit of
MDL No. 2497 Case No. 4:15-cv-03916-YGR
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff Miao Luo and Yi Qin’s Unopposed Motion for Approval of Minor’s
Compromise
2
1
funds. This completed form shall be provided to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company no less
2
than ninety (90) days prior to ________________. Delay in providing this information may
3
cause the Periodic Payment(s) to be delayed.
4
6.
If a periodic payment is unable to be completed and S.L. cannot be contacted,
5
6
7
plaintiff’s counsel of record will remain responsible to make its best efforts to locate S.L.
7.
The parties to this settlement shall cooperate fully and execute any and all
8
supplementary documents, including the Qualified Assignment document, and to take all
9
additional actions which may be necessary or appropriate to give full force and effect to the basic
10
terms and intent of this settlement.
11
8.
Plaintiffs’ counsel may attach the fully executed settlement documents, when
12
obtained, to this Order for purposes of submitting same to Metropolitan Life Insurance
13
14
15
Company.
9.
Should delays in effectuating the financial terms of this settlement cause a
16
decrease in the future payment amount to be received by S.L., no further pleading or order of this
17
Court shall be necessary so long as the total payment is no less than 97% of the amount set forth
18
in the Minor’s Compromise and the Declaration of Enid Duany Mendoza, all other variables
19
(payout date, purchase price of the annuities) remaining the same.
20
21
10.
The Court approves the payment of $1,875.00 to Dr. Gennady Musher; and
22
$4,984.00 to the Western Eye Center in Shanghai, China. The Court further approves payment
23
of $176 to Statewide Interpreters Corporation for translation costs when S.L. went to medical
24
appointments in the U.S. with his parents. These liens shall be paid from the allotment for
25
attorneys’ fees pursuant to an agreement among counsel.
26
11.
The Court approves payment of ________________ as attorneys’ fees.
27
28
MDL No. 2497 Case No. 4:15-cv-03916-YGR
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff Miao Luo and Yi Qin’s Unopposed Motion for Approval of Minor’s
Compromise
3
1
12.
The Court approves dismissal of all claims of S.L. against defendant, with
2
prejudice. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall submit dismissal promptly after the annuities set forth in the
3
settlement documents have been funded, and all other due consideration has been received by
4
Plaintiffs’ counsel.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
April 28
DATED: _____________________, 2016
________________________________
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
9
U.S. District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MDL No. 2497 Case No. 4:15-cv-03916-YGR
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff Miao Luo and Yi Qin’s Unopposed Motion for Approval of Minor’s
Compromise
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?