STMicroelectronics, Inc. v. Lopez
Filing
18
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 17 Order Reassigning Case. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/31/2015. Case Management Conference set for 1/7/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/6/15. (jebS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.,
Case No. 15-cv-03919-PJH
Plaintiff,
5
v.
ORDER SETTING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
6
7
MANUEL LOPEZ,
[Reassigned Case]
Defendant.
8
9
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The above matter having been reassigned to the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton. It is
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
hereby ordered, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Civil L. R. 16-10, that a Case
12
Management Conference shall be held in this case on January 7, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., in
13
Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Federal Building, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California.
14
Lead counsel shall meet and confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) prior to
15
the Case Management Conference with respect to those subjects set forth in Fed. R. Civ.
16
P. 16(c). Not less than seven (7) days before the conference, counsel shall file a joint
17
case management statement addressing each of the items listed in the "Standing Order
18
For All Judges of the Northern District -- Contents of Joint Case Management statement,"
19
which is attached to this order and can also be found on the court's website. A proposed
20
order is not necessary. Following the conference, the court will enter its own Case
21
Management and Pretrial Order. If any party is proceeding without counsel, separate
22
statements may be filed by each party.
23
Each party shall appear personally or by lead counsel prepared to address all of
24
the matters referred to in this Order and with authority to enter stipulations and make
25
admissions pursuant to this Order. Any request to reschedule the date of the conference
26
shall be made in writing, and by stipulation if possible, at least ten (10) days before the
27
date of the conference and must be based upon good cause.
28
1
STANDING ORDER FOR ALL JUDGES
2
OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
CONTENTS OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
4
5
All judges of the Northern District of California require identical information in Joint Case
6
Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9. The parties must include
7
the following information in their statement which, except in unusually complex cases,
8
should not exceed ten pages:
9
1.
Jurisdiction and Service: The basis for the court’s subject matter jurisdiction over
plaintiff's claims and defendant’s counterclaims, whether any issues exist regarding
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
personal jurisdiction or venue, whether any parties remain to be served, and, if any
12
parties remain to be served, a proposed deadline for service.
13
2.
14
issues in dispute.
15
3.
16
points of law, including reference to specific statutes and decisions.
17
4.
18
motions.
19
5.
20
expected to be added or dismissed and a proposed deadline for amending the pleadings.
21
6.
22
Guidelines Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (“ESI
23
Guidelines”), and confirming that the parties have met and conferred pursuant to Fed. R.
24
Civ. P. 26(f) regarding reasonable and proportionate steps taken to preserve evidence
25
relevant to the issues reasonably evident in this action. See ESI Guidelines 2.01 and
26
2.02, and Checklist for ESI Meet and Confer.
27
7.
28
disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, and a description of the disclosures made.
Facts: A brief chronology of the facts and a statement of the principal factual
Legal Issues: A brief statement, without extended legal argument, of the disputed
Motions: All prior and pending motions, their current status, and any anticipated
Amendment of Pleadings: The extent to which parties, claims, or defenses are
Evidence Preservation: A brief report certifying that the parties have reviewed the
Disclosures: Whether there has been full and timely compliance with the initial
2
1
8.
Discovery: Discovery taken to date, if any, the scope of anticipated discovery, any
2
proposed limitations or modifications of the discovery rules, a brief report on whether the
3
parties have considered entering into a stipulated e-discovery order, a proposed
4
discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and any identified discovery disputes.
5
9.
6
certified.
7
10.
8
this court, or before another court or administrative body.
9
11.
Class Actions: If a class action, a proposal for how and when the class will be
Related Cases: Any related cases or proceedings pending before another judge of
Relief: All relief sought through complaint or counterclaim, including the amount of
any damages sought and a description of the bases on which damages are calculated. In
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
addition, any party from whom damages are sought must describe the bases on which it
12
contends damages should be calculated if liability is established.
13
12.
14
ADR plan for the case, including compliance with ADR L.R. 3-5 and a description of key
15
discovery or motions necessary to position the parties to negotiate a resolution.
16
13.
17
have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings including trial and entry of
18
judgment. ___ Yes
19
14.
20
a special master, or the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
21
15.
22
suggestions to expedite the presentation of evidence at trial (e.g., through summaries or
23
stipulated facts), and any request to bifurcate issues, claims, or defenses.
24
16.
25
under the Expedited Trial Procedure of General Order No. 64 Attachment A. If all parties
26
agree, they shall instead of this Statement, file an executed Agreement for Expedited
27
Trial and a Joint Expedited Case Management Statement, in accordance with General
28
Order No. 64 Attachments B and D.
Settlement and ADR: Prospects for settlement, ADR efforts to date, and a specific
Consent to Magistrate Judge For All Purposes: Whether all parties will consent to
___ No
Other References: Whether the case is suitable for reference to binding arbitration,
Narrowing of Issues: Issues that can be narrowed by agreement or by motion,
Expedited Trial Procedure: Whether this is the type of case that can be handled
3
17.
2
dis
spositive mo
otions, pret
trial confere
ence and triial.
3
18.
4
len
ngth of the trial.
t
5
19.
6
file the “Cert
ed
tification of Interested Entities or Persons” re
equired by Civil Local Rule 3-16.
7
In addition, ea party must restate in the case managem
ach
m
e
e
ment statem
ment the co
ontents of
8
n
ying any pe
ersons, firm partners
ms,
ships, corpo
orations (inc
cluding
its certification by identify
9
rations) or other entitie known by the party to have either: (i) a fin
o
es
y
nancial
parent corpor
10
erest in the subject ma
e
atter in controversy or in a party t the proce
r
to
eeding; or ( any
(ii)
inte
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
1
Schedu
uling: Propo
osed dates for designation of exp
s
perts, disco
overy cutoff hearing of
f,
oth kind of interest tha could be substantiallly affected by the outc
her
i
at
s
come of the
e
12
pro
oceeding.
13
20.
14
rev
viewed the Guidelines for Profess
sional Cond
duct for the Northern D
e
District of C
California.
15
21.
16
of this matter.
.
Trial: Whether the case will be tried to a jury or to the court a the expe
W
e
b
and
ected
ties or Pers
Disclos
sure of Non
n-party Interested Entit
sons: Whet
ther each party has
Professional Cond
duct: Whether all attor
rneys of rec
cord for the parties ha
e
ave
Such other matters as may facilitate the just, spee and ine
o
f
e
edy
expensive disposition
17
18
19
20
21
S
RED.
IT IS SO ORDER
ated: November 6, 2015
Da
__
__________
__________
__________
_________
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?