Pandolfi v. Moreno et al

Filing 33

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 32 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2016)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5
6

DIANE PANDOLFI,
Plaintiff,

7
8
9
10
11

Case No.: 15-cv-3928 YGR
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER

vs.
MARILYN MORENO AND MORENO FAMILY
LAW FIRM,

Re: Dkt. No. 32

Defendants.

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13

The Court is in receipt of the parties’ Stipulation for Order Modifying Pretrial Scheduling

14

Order filed September 29, 2016. (Dkt. No. 32.) The Court will not grant the requested extension of

15

dates and deadlines as the Court’s calendar will not permit a four-month extension. The parties’

16

stipulation is DENIED.

17

However, if the parties wish to consent for all purposes to a magistrate judge who may be able

18

to accommodate the requested trial date, they should meet and confer to discuss whether their clients

19

will consent and to whom. The Court will accept stipulated requests for referral to a specific

20

magistrate judge or magistrate judges. Profiles of all magistrate judges are available on the Court’s

21

website at http://cand.uscourts.gov/judges and in the brochure, Consenting to a Magistrate Judge’s

22

Jurisdiction In the Northern District of California (.pdf), also available on the Court’s website.

23

This Order terminates Docket Number 32.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: September 30, 2016

26
27
28

_______________________________________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE