Balance Studio, Inc. v. Cybernet Entertainment, LLC

Filing 44

ORDER to File Supplemental Information re 32 MOTION to proceed under a pseudonym filed by Balance Studio, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 07/22/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BALANCE STUDIO, INC., Case No. 15-cv-04038-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 CYBERNET ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 32 The court has reviewed the parties’ briefing on Counter-Defendant’s motion to proceed 13 under a pseudonym. [Docket Nos. 32, 36, 38, 39.] In Defendant Cybernet Entertainment, LLC’s 14 (“Cybernet”) response, it asserts that, “at a minimum,” Counter-Defendant’s “right to proceed 15 with a pseudonym [should] be conditioned on Counter Defendant providing a declaration” 16 attesting to her legal name and other information. [Docket No. 36 at 11.] Along with her reply 17 brief, Counter-Defendant filed under seal a declaration that appears to satisfy Cybernet’s request. 18 [See Docket No. 39-4 (Counter-Defendant Decl., June 28, 2016).] 19 By no later than 12:00 p.m. on July 26, 2016, Cybernet shall file a statement in which it 20 indicates whether it has any remaining concerns about prejudice it might suffer if the court grants 21 Counter-Defendant’s motion to proceed pseudonymously. If Cybernet contends that the risk of 22 prejudice remains, it shall specifically identify any such prejudice. S ER R NIA FO Ju H 28 RT 27 ______________________________________ Donna M. Ryu . Ryu United States dge DonnJudge Magistrate a M NO 26 Dated: July 22, 2016 DERED O OR IT IS S LI 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. A 24 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 23 UNIT ED United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 ORDER TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION RE COUNTERDEFENDANTS MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER A PSEUDONYM N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?