Conerly v. Flores et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Early Neutral Evaluation by Christopher Flores, Jeremy Lathrop filed by Christopher Flores, David Conerly, Jeremy Lathrop, Case referred to early neutral evaluation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/14/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2016)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
David Conerly
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
City of Berkeley Officer
Flores and Officer Lathrop ,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/

CASE NO. ______________________
4:15-cv-04069-KAW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9

other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
03/10/16

____________________________
/s/ Stanley Goff
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________
03/10/16

____________________________
/s/ Lynne Bourgault
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER
9
9

Dated:

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

3/14/16

__________________________________
MAGISTRATE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2