Bond et al v. Lake County et al
Filing
53
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL for Plaintiff. Attorney Ellen Dove is relieved as Plaintiff's counsel of record. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 7/24/2017. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
WILLIAM ANTHONY BOND,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
v.
PHILIPPI,
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 15-cv-04079-KAW
12
13
Because the Plaintiff has requested and is in need of counsel to assist him/her in this matter
14
and a volunteer attorney is willing to be appointed to undertake this representation at the request of
15
the Federal Pro Bono Project, Attorneys Jordan Trent Jones (SBN 166600) and Ben Kleinman-
16
Green (SBN 261846) of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton are hereby appointed as counsel for
17
Plaintiff in this matter.
18
The scope of this appointment shall be for:
19
(X)
all purposes for the duration of the case
20
( )
the limited purpose of representing the litigant in the course of
21
( )
mediation
22
( )
early neutral evaluation
23
( )
settlement conference
24
( )
briefing ( ) and hearing on the following motion (e.g., motion for summary
25
judgment or motion to dismiss):
26
27
28
( )
discovery as follows:
1
( )
other:
2
3
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s counsel Ellen Dove is relieved as counsel of record.
4
All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed until four weeks from the date of this
5
order. Counsel shall be familiar with General Order No. 25 and the Federal Pro Bono Project
6
Guidelines posted on the Court’s website.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 24, 2017
______________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?