Conde et al v. 2020 Companies LLC et al
Filing
238
STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING DATE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/15/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
HAROLD LICHTEN, pro hac vice
(hlichten@llrlaw.com)
JILL KAHN, pro hac vice
(jkahn@llrlaw.com)
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
(617) 994-5800
Facsimile:
(617) 994-5801
MATTHEW D. CARLSON (State Bar No. 273242)
mcarlson@llrlaw.com
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
466 Geary St., Suite 201
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: (415) 630-2651
Facsimile: (617) 994-5801
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Shikwana
Jennings and Lisa Drake
11
12
13
14
CHRISTOPHER W. DECKER (SBN 229426)
christopher.decker@ogletreedeakins.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone:
213.239.9800
Facsimile:
213.239.9045
15
16
17
18
WENDY V. MILLER, pro hac vice
wendy.miller@ogletreedeakins.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
401 Commerce Street, Suite 1200
Nashville, TN 37067
Telephone:
615.254.1900
Facsimile:
615.254.1908
19
20
Attorneys for Defendant
2020 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
21
22
23
24
KRISTIN ALEXANDRIA SMITH
ksmith@fosteremploymentlaw.com
Foster Employment Law
3000 Lakeshore Avenue
Oakland, CA 94610
510-763-1900
Fax: 510-763-5952
25
26
27
28
2020 Stipulation
11-14-17.docx
MICHAEL L. THOMPSON, pro hac vice
mthompson@lehrmiddlebrooks.com
Lehr Middlebrooks Vreeland and Thompson, P.C.
2021 Third Avenue North
Birmingham, AL 35203
1
Case No. 15-cv-04080-KAW
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STAY OF PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FLSA CLAIMS OF
EXPANDED COLLECTIVE OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS
1
205-326-3002
Fax: 205-326-3002
2
3
4
Attorneys for Defendant
OPEN DOOR MARKETING, LLC
LARRY DALE CLARK
JERRIMY FARRIS
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
SHIKWANA JENNINGS AND LISA
DRAKE,
Plaintiffs,
11
12
v.
2020 COMPANIES, INC., OPEN
DOOR MARKETING, LLC,
14 JERRIMY FARRIS, AND LARRY
CLARK,
13
15
Case No. 15-cv-04080-KAW
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES
AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING
STAY OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
EQUITABLE TOLLING OF THE STATUTE
OF LIMITATIONS FOR FLSA CLAIMS OF
EXPANDED COLLECTIVE OPT-IN
PLAINTIFFS
Defendants.
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
Magistrate Judge:
16
17
September 8, 2015
None
Hon. Kandis A. Westmore
18
19
20
Plaintiffs Shikwana Jennings and Lisa Drake, Defendant 2020 Communications, Inc.
21
(“2020”), Open Door Marketing, LLC, Jerrimy Farris and Larry Clark, by and through their
22
respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
23
24
25
26
1) As reflected in this Court’s Order Staying Motion to Compel; Granting Motion to Join
(Dkt. No. 235), on November 8, 2017, this Court stayed this case with respect to any
“opt-in Plaintiffs who have signed an arbitration agreement, and would be subject to a
motion to compel arbitration.”
27
28
2020 Stipulation
11-14-17.docx
2) Plaintiffs’ Motion For Equitable Tolling of the Statute of Limitations For FLSA Claims
2
Case No. 15-cv-04080-KAW
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STAY OF PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FLSA CLAIMS OF
EXPANDED COLLECTIVE OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS
1
Of Expanded Collective Opt-In Plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 233) likely seeks relief only on
2
behalf of individuals whom defendants have identified as having signed an arbitration
3
agreement and who would be subject to a motion to compel arbitration.
4
3) As such, the parties acknowledge that it would be most efficient to stay Plaintiffs’
5
Motion For Equitable Tolling of the Statute of Limitations For FLSA Claims Of
6
Expanded Collective Opt-In Plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 233) in light of this Court’s Order
7
Staying Motion to Compel; Granting Motion to Join (Dkt. No. 235).
8
9
4) Accordingly, the parties agree and stipulate that Plaintiffs’ Motion For Equitable
10
Tolling of the Statute of Limitations For FLSA Claims Of Expanded Collective Opt-In
11
Plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 233) should not be heard on December 7, 2017, and that an
12
appropriate briefing and hearing schedule relating to the Motion should be determined
13
after the Court lifts the stay.
14
5) Within seven (7) days following this Court’s lifting of the stay of this case with respect
15
to opt-in Plaintiffs who have signed arbitration agreements, the parties will submit to
16
the Court a briefing and hearing schedule concerning Plaintiffs’ Motion For Equitable
17
Tolling of the Statute of Limitations For FLSA Claims Of Expanded Collective Opt-In
18
Plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 233).
19
20
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
21
22
23
DATED: November 14, 2017
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN.
24
25
26
27
28
2020 Stipulation
11-14-17.docx
By: /s/ Harold L. Lichten w/permission
Harold L. Lichten
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
3
Case No. 15-cv-04080-KAW
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STAY OF PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FLSA CLAIMS OF
EXPANDED COLLECTIVE OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS
1
2
DATED: November 14, 2017
3
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
4
5
By: /s/ Wendy V. Miller
Wendy V. Miller
6
Attorneys for Defendant
20/20 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(erroneously sued as 2020 Companies LLC)
7
8
9
10
DATED: November 14, 2017
LEHR MIDDLEBROOKS VREELAND AND
THOMPSON, P.C.
11
12
By: /s/ Michael L. Thompson
Michael L. Thompson
13
Attorneys for Defendants
OPEN DOOR MARKETING, LLC
LARRY DALE CLARK
JERRIMY FARRIS
14
15
16
17
18
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
11/15/17
DATED: ________________________
_____________________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
21
22
31999736.1
23
24
25
26
27
28
2020 Stipulation
11-14-17.docx
4
Case No. 15-cv-04080-KAW
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STAY OF PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FLSA CLAIMS OF
EXPANDED COLLECTIVE OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?