Conde et al v. 2020 Companies LLC et al

Filing 238

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING DATE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/15/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 HAROLD LICHTEN, pro hac vice (hlichten@llrlaw.com) JILL KAHN, pro hac vice (jkahn@llrlaw.com) LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: (617) 994-5800 Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 MATTHEW D. CARLSON (State Bar No. 273242) mcarlson@llrlaw.com LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 466 Geary St., Suite 201 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 630-2651 Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Shikwana Jennings and Lisa Drake 11 12 13 14 CHRISTOPHER W. DECKER (SBN 229426) christopher.decker@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213.239.9800 Facsimile: 213.239.9045 15 16 17 18 WENDY V. MILLER, pro hac vice wendy.miller@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 401 Commerce Street, Suite 1200 Nashville, TN 37067 Telephone: 615.254.1900 Facsimile: 615.254.1908 19 20 Attorneys for Defendant 2020 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 21 22 23 24 KRISTIN ALEXANDRIA SMITH ksmith@fosteremploymentlaw.com Foster Employment Law 3000 Lakeshore Avenue Oakland, CA 94610 510-763-1900 Fax: 510-763-5952 25 26 27 28 2020 Stipulation 11-14-17.docx MICHAEL L. THOMPSON, pro hac vice mthompson@lehrmiddlebrooks.com Lehr Middlebrooks Vreeland and Thompson, P.C. 2021 Third Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203 1 Case No. 15-cv-04080-KAW JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STAY OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FLSA CLAIMS OF EXPANDED COLLECTIVE OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS 1 205-326-3002 Fax: 205-326-3002 2 3 4 Attorneys for Defendant OPEN DOOR MARKETING, LLC LARRY DALE CLARK JERRIMY FARRIS 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 SHIKWANA JENNINGS AND LISA DRAKE, Plaintiffs, 11 12 v. 2020 COMPANIES, INC., OPEN DOOR MARKETING, LLC, 14 JERRIMY FARRIS, AND LARRY CLARK, 13 15 Case No. 15-cv-04080-KAW JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STAY OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FLSA CLAIMS OF EXPANDED COLLECTIVE OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS Defendants. Complaint Filed: Trial Date: Magistrate Judge: 16 17 September 8, 2015 None Hon. Kandis A. Westmore 18 19 20 Plaintiffs Shikwana Jennings and Lisa Drake, Defendant 2020 Communications, Inc. 21 (“2020”), Open Door Marketing, LLC, Jerrimy Farris and Larry Clark, by and through their 22 respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 23 24 25 26 1) As reflected in this Court’s Order Staying Motion to Compel; Granting Motion to Join (Dkt. No. 235), on November 8, 2017, this Court stayed this case with respect to any “opt-in Plaintiffs who have signed an arbitration agreement, and would be subject to a motion to compel arbitration.” 27 28 2020 Stipulation 11-14-17.docx 2) Plaintiffs’ Motion For Equitable Tolling of the Statute of Limitations For FLSA Claims 2 Case No. 15-cv-04080-KAW JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STAY OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FLSA CLAIMS OF EXPANDED COLLECTIVE OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS 1 Of Expanded Collective Opt-In Plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 233) likely seeks relief only on 2 behalf of individuals whom defendants have identified as having signed an arbitration 3 agreement and who would be subject to a motion to compel arbitration. 4 3) As such, the parties acknowledge that it would be most efficient to stay Plaintiffs’ 5 Motion For Equitable Tolling of the Statute of Limitations For FLSA Claims Of 6 Expanded Collective Opt-In Plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 233) in light of this Court’s Order 7 Staying Motion to Compel; Granting Motion to Join (Dkt. No. 235). 8 9 4) Accordingly, the parties agree and stipulate that Plaintiffs’ Motion For Equitable 10 Tolling of the Statute of Limitations For FLSA Claims Of Expanded Collective Opt-In 11 Plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 233) should not be heard on December 7, 2017, and that an 12 appropriate briefing and hearing schedule relating to the Motion should be determined 13 after the Court lifts the stay. 14 5) Within seven (7) days following this Court’s lifting of the stay of this case with respect 15 to opt-in Plaintiffs who have signed arbitration agreements, the parties will submit to 16 the Court a briefing and hearing schedule concerning Plaintiffs’ Motion For Equitable 17 Tolling of the Statute of Limitations For FLSA Claims Of Expanded Collective Opt-In 18 Plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 233). 19 20 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 21 22 23 DATED: November 14, 2017 LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN. 24 25 26 27 28 2020 Stipulation 11-14-17.docx By: /s/ Harold L. Lichten w/permission Harold L. Lichten Attorneys for Plaintiffs 3 Case No. 15-cv-04080-KAW JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STAY OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FLSA CLAIMS OF EXPANDED COLLECTIVE OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS 1 2 DATED: November 14, 2017 3 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 4 5 By: /s/ Wendy V. Miller Wendy V. Miller 6 Attorneys for Defendant 20/20 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (erroneously sued as 2020 Companies LLC) 7 8 9 10 DATED: November 14, 2017 LEHR MIDDLEBROOKS VREELAND AND THOMPSON, P.C. 11 12 By: /s/ Michael L. Thompson Michael L. Thompson 13 Attorneys for Defendants OPEN DOOR MARKETING, LLC LARRY DALE CLARK JERRIMY FARRIS 14 15 16 17 18 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 11/15/17 DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 21 22 31999736.1 23 24 25 26 27 28 2020 Stipulation 11-14-17.docx 4 Case No. 15-cv-04080-KAW JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STAY OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FLSA CLAIMS OF EXPANDED COLLECTIVE OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?