Via Licensing Corporation v. Pegatron Corporation et al

Filing 40

ORDER GRANTING 38 STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Responses due by 1/22/2016. Replies due by 2/5/2016. Motion Hearing set for 2/19/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/18/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2015)

Case 4:15-cv-04086-JSW Document 38 Filed 12/17/15 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Laura Kabler Oswell (State Bar No. 241281)
Thomas E. Fullerton (State Bar No. 305104)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Garrard R. Beeney (appearance pro hac vice)
Laura R. Paliani (appearance pro hac vice)
Malaika R. Staten (appearance pro hac vice)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
VIA LICENSING CORPORATION,

Case No. 4:15-cv-04086-JSW

15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
18

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS____________

PEGATRON CORPORATION, PEGATRON
TECHNOLOGY SERVICE INC. and UNIHAN
CORPORATION,

19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-04086-JSW

Case 4:15-cv-04086-JSW Document 38 Filed 12/17/15 Page 2 of 3

1
2

WHEREAS, on September 8, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Complaint for Breach of
Contract, Specific Performance, and Promissory Fraud (Dkt. No. 1) (the “Complaint”);

3

WHEREAS, on September 22, 2015, Defendants Pegatron Corporation, Pegatron

4

Technology Service Inc. and Unihan Corporation (together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”) accepted

5

service of the Summons and Complaint (Dkt. Nos. 9-11);

6

WHEREAS on October 30, 2015, Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granted the

7

Parties’ Stipulation to allow the Defendants until December 15, 2015 to answer or otherwise

8

respond to the Complaint (Dkt. No. 13) (the “Stipulation Setting Schedule on Response to the

9

Complaint”);

10

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Stipulation Setting Schedule on Response to the

11

Complaint, the Parties agreed that, if Defendants file any motion in response to the Complaint,

12

the Parties will meet and confer on a briefing schedule;

13
14

WHEREAS on December 15, 2015, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss
Count III of the Complaint (Dkt. No. 35) (the “Motion to Dismiss”);

15

WHEREAS the Parties have met and conferred on such briefing schedule.

16

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between

17
18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, that:
1.

Plaintiff shall have until and including January 22, 2016 to file an

opposition to the Motion to Dismiss.
2.

Defendants shall have until and including February 5, 2016 to file their

reply to Plaintiff’s opposition.
3.

The Motion to Dismiss shall be heard on February 19, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.,

23

or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard by the Honorable Jeffrey S. White.

24

DATED: December 17, 2015

25
26
27
28

/s/ Laura Kabler Oswell
Laura Kabler Oswell
Thomas E. Fullerton
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
-1-

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-04086-JSW

Case 4:15-cv-04086-JSW Document 38 Filed 12/17/15 Page 3 of 3
Garrard R. Beeney (appearance pro hac vice)
Laura R. Paliani (appearance pro hac vice)
Malaika R. Staten (appearance pro hac vice)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

1
2
3
4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiff VIA LICENSING
CORPORATION

6
7

DATED: December 17, 2015.
/s/ Ronald S. Lemieux (w/permission by LKO)
Ronald S. Lemieux (CA Bar No. 120822)
Vid R. Bhakar (CA Bar No. 220210)
Lenny Huang (CA Bar No. 264386)
SINGULARITY LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Ste. 610
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9
10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendants PEGATRON
CORPORATION, PEGATRON TECHNOLOGY
SERVICE INC. and UNIHAN CORPORATION

14
15
16
17

*
*
*
The motion to dismiss shall be heard on February 19, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19
20

DATED: ___________, 2015.
December 18

_______________________________________
The Hon. Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
Northern District of California

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-04086-JSW