Malone v. KAG WEST, LLC

Filing 24

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER [*AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT*] TO REMAND CONSOLIDATED ACTION TO ALAMEDA SUPERIOR COURT AND VACATING COMPLIANCE HEARING. This consolidated action is ordered remanded back to Alameda County Superior Court under the docket Patrick Malone v KAG West, LLC, Case No. RG15784137. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/17/18. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 ALEXANDER KRAKOW + GLICK LLP Michael S. Morrison (State Bar No. 205320) 401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1000 Santa Monica, California 90401 T: 310 394 0888 | F: 310 394 0811 E: mmorrison@akgllp.com 4 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Respondent PATRICK MALONE (Additional Counsel Listed on Following Page) 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 KAG WEST, LLC, a California limited liability company; THE KENAN ADVANTAGE GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Petitioners, Case No. 4:15-cv-03827-YGR Case No. 4:15-cv-04262-YGR (Assigned to the Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers) 15 v. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 PATRICK MALONE, an individual, Respondent. JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND ACTION TO ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT; VACATING COMPLIANCE HEARING *as modified by the Court* PATRICK MALONE, an individual, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and the general public, Plaintiff, 23 24 25 26 27 v. KAG WEST, LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendant. 28 -iJOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND ACTION TO ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Case No. 4:15-cv-03827-YGR Case No. 4:15-cv-04262-YGR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS W. FALVEY THOMAS W. FALVEY, SBN 65744 MICHAEL H. BOYAMIAN, SBN 256107 ARMAND R. KIZIRIAN, SBN 293992 550 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 1500 Glendale, California 91203 T: (818) 547-5200 | F: (818) 500-9307 Attorneys for Respondent and Plaintiff PATRICK MALONE BRIAN L. JOHNSRUD, State Bar No. 184474 VICTORIA R. CARRADERO, State Bar No. 217885 STEPHEN N. YANG, State Bar No. 142474 CURLEY, HURTGEN & JOHNSRUD LLP 4400 Bohannon Drive, Suite 230 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: 650.600.5300 Facsimile: 650.323.1002 E-mail: bjohnsrud@chjllp.com vcarradero@chjllp.com syang@chjllp.com Attorneys for Defendants and Petitioners KAG WEST, LLC and THE KENAN ADVANTAGE GROUP, INC. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - ii JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND ACTION TO ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Case No. 4:15-cv-03827-YGR Case No. 4:15-cv-04262-YGR 1 This Joint Stipulation to Remand Action to Alameda County Superior Court 2 is made and entered into by and between Plaintiff and Respondent Patrick Malone, 3 individually and on behalf of the general public, and Defendants and Petitioners 4 KAG West, LLC and The Kenan Advantage Group, Inc. (“Defendants-Petitioners”) 5 (the “Parties”). 6 WHEREAS, the action of KAG West, LLC, et al. v. Patrick Malone, 7 Northern District of California Case No. 4:15-cv-03827-YGR was initiated by 8 Defendants-Petitioners on August 21, 2015 in the form of a Petition to Compel 9 Arbitration against Plaintiff-Respondent Patrick Malone for the various wage and 10 hour claims he had asserted in correspondence dated July 22, 2015 (“District Court 11 Action”); 12 WHEREAS, the alleged putative wage and hour class action and Private 13 Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) action of Patrick Malone v. KAG West, LLC, 14 Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG15784137 was filed by Plaintiff- 15 Respondent in California Superior Court on September 1, 2015 (“California 16 Superior Court Action”); 17 WHEREAS, Defendants-Petitioners removed the California Superior Court 18 Action to the Northern District of California on September 18, 2015 (“Removed 19 California Superior Court Action”); 20 WHEREAS, District Court Judge Thelton E. Henderson (Ret.) granted 21 Defendants-Petitioners’ Petition to Compel Arbitration in the District Court Action 22 on November 3, 2015, correspondingly stayed Plaintiff Malone’s PAGA 23 representative claims and consolidated the District Court Action and the Removed 24 California Superior Court Action -; 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Respondent Malone’s putative class claims were subsequently dismissed by a JAMS arbitrator; WHEREAS, in addition to the consolidated action in federal court for claims brought forth by Mr. Malone, a representative PAGA suit initiated by an individual -1JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND ACTION TO ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Case No. 4:15-cv-03827-YGR Case No. 4:15-cv-04262-YGR 1 named James Souza remains pending in Alameda County Superior Court under the 2 title of James Souza v. KAG West, LLC, Case No. RG16814354. Mr. Souza is 3 represented by the same counsel of record in this action; 4 WHEREAS, the Souza v. KAG West action, as a PAGA only action, could 5 not be removed to the Northern District of California from Alameda County 6 Superior Court as currently pled and remains pending there; 7 WHEREAS, the Parties in this consolidated action, along with Plaintiff 8 James Souza in James Souza v. KAG West, LLC, Case No. RG16814354, have 9 reached a global settlement of their wage and hour claims against Defendants- 10 11 Petitioners that is subject to court review and approval; WHEREAS, this global settlement, if approved, would resolve all claims 12 alleged in this consolidated action, in Malone’s individual action pending in 13 arbitration before JAMS, and in the Alameda County Superior Court Souza PAGA 14 action; 15 16 17 18 19 WHEREAS, the Parties believe it would be most efficient to have a single court consider their global settlement; WHEREAS, it is in the interests of judicial economy to have a single court consider the global settlement reached by the Parties; WHEREAS, the present consolidated federal court action could be 20 remanded from the Northern District of California back to state court based on the 21 original filing of the Malone v. KAG West California Superior Court Action in 22 Alameda County Superior Court; 23 24 25 IT IS THEREFORE AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD THAT: 1. For the sole purpose of facilitating state court review and potential 26 approval of the Parties’ global settlement of all disputed claims between the Parties, 27 this consolidated action shall be remanded back to Alameda County Superior Court 28 under the docket Patrick Malone v. KAG West, LLC, Case No. RG15784137. -2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND ACTION TO ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Case No. 4:15-cv-03827-YGR Case No. 4:15-cv-04262-YGR 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 Dated: July 17, 2018 4 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS W. FALVEY ALEXANDER KRAKOW + GLICK, LLP 5 6 By: s/Michael Morrison Thomas W. Falvey Michael H. Boyamian Armand R. Kizirian Michael S. Morrison Attorney for Respondent PATRICK MALONE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: July 17, 2018 CURLEY HESSINGER & JOHNSRUD LLP 14 15 16 17 18 19 By: s/ Stephen Yang Brian Lee Johnsrud Victoria R. Carradero Stephen Yang Attorney for Petitioners KAG WEST, LLC and THE KENAN ADVANTAGE GROUP 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND ACTION TO ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Case No. 4:15-cv-03827-YGR Case No. 4:15-cv-04262-YGR 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 Having reviewed the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Remand Action to Alameda County Superior Court, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby rules as follows: 1. This consolidated action is ORDERED remanded back to Alameda 7 County Superior Court under the docket Patrick Malone v. KAG West, LLC, Case 8 No. RG15784137. 9 2. The compliance hearing set for July 20, 2018 is hereby VACATED. 10 11 The Clerk shall close the file. 12 13 14 Dated: July 17, 2018 By: 15 Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers United States District Court Judge Northern District of California 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND ACTION TO ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Case No. 4:15-cv-03827-YGR Case No. 4:15-cv-04262-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?