Ferrari et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
Filing
106
ORDER VACATING AUGUST 30, 2016 HEARING re 81 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) filed by Speedway Motorsports Inc, 86 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Comp laint filed by David Ahlheim, AUTOBAHN, INC., Joe Cox, SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC., O. Bruton Smith, 73 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Dietmar Exler. The Court will issue a written decision on the papers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/24/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2016)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
STEVE FERRARI, ET AL.,
Case No. 15-cv-04379-YGR
Plaintiffs,
6
ORDER VACATING AUGUST 30, 2016
HEARING
v.
7
8
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, ET AL.,
Dkt Nos. 73, 81, 86
Defendants.
9
Currently pending before the Court are three motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Amended Complaint, filed on behalf of: (1) Defendants Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, and Dietmar
12
Exler (Dkt. No. 73); (2) Defendant Speedway Motorsports, Inc. (Dkt. No. 81); and (3) Defendants
13
Autobahn, Inc., David Ahlheim, Joe Cox, O. Bruton Smith, and Sonic Automotive Inc. (Dkt. No.
14
86).
15
The Court finds these motions appropriate for decision without oral argument, as permitted
16
by Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. See also Lake at Las Vegas
17
Investors Group, Inc. v. Pacific Malibu Dev. Corp., 933 F.2d 724, 729 (9th Cir. 1991).
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Accordingly, the hearing set for August 30, 2016, is VACATED. The Court will issue a
written decision on the papers.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 24, 2016
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?