Ha v. Caldwell et al
Filing
27
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying as moot 20 Motion to Dismiss. The hearing set for February 27, 2018 is VACATED. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2018)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
JAKE HA,
Plaintiff,
7
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS
MOOT
vs.
8
9
CASE NO. 15-cv-04485-YGR
JOHN E. CALDWELL, ET AL.,
Re: Dkt. No. 20
Defendants.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
On December 21, 2017, nominal defendant Advanced Micro Devices and defendants W.
12
13
Michael Barnes, Richard A. Bergman, John E. Caldwell, Henry WK Chow, Bruce L. Claflin, Nora
14
M. Denzel, Nicholas M. Donofrio, Martin L. Edelman, John R. Harding, Joseph A. Householder,
15
Michael J. Inglis, Rory P. Read, Thomas J. Seifert, Lisa T. Su, and Ahmed Yahia (collectively,
16
“defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss the Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaints of
17
Christopher Hamilton and David Hamilton (the “Hamilton Complaint”) and plaintiff Jake Ha (the
18
“Ha Complaint”) with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 23.1.
19
(Dkt. No. 20 (“Motion to Dismiss”).) 1
On February 2, 2018, plaintiff Jake Ha filed a Verified Amended Shareholder Derivative
20
21
Complaint (Dkt. No. 25 (“Amended Complaint”).) In light of the filing of the Amended
22
Complaint, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT with respect to the Ha Complaint.2 The
23
hearing set for February 27, 2018 with respect to the same is VACATED.
24
\\
25
\\
26
1
27
28
The same Motion to Dismiss was filed in civil action 15-cv-01890-YGR (“Hamilton”).
(See Dkt. No. 38.)
2
The corresponding request for judicial notice (Dkt. No. 22) is also DENIED AS MOOT.
1
This Order terminates Docket Number 20.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: February 9, 2018
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?