Ha v. Caldwell et al

Filing 27

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying as moot 20 Motion to Dismiss. The hearing set for February 27, 2018 is VACATED. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JAKE HA, Plaintiff, 7 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT vs. 8 9 CASE NO. 15-cv-04485-YGR JOHN E. CALDWELL, ET AL., Re: Dkt. No. 20 Defendants. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 On December 21, 2017, nominal defendant Advanced Micro Devices and defendants W. 12 13 Michael Barnes, Richard A. Bergman, John E. Caldwell, Henry WK Chow, Bruce L. Claflin, Nora 14 M. Denzel, Nicholas M. Donofrio, Martin L. Edelman, John R. Harding, Joseph A. Householder, 15 Michael J. Inglis, Rory P. Read, Thomas J. Seifert, Lisa T. Su, and Ahmed Yahia (collectively, 16 “defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss the Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaints of 17 Christopher Hamilton and David Hamilton (the “Hamilton Complaint”) and plaintiff Jake Ha (the 18 “Ha Complaint”) with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 23.1. 19 (Dkt. No. 20 (“Motion to Dismiss”).) 1 On February 2, 2018, plaintiff Jake Ha filed a Verified Amended Shareholder Derivative 20 21 Complaint (Dkt. No. 25 (“Amended Complaint”).) In light of the filing of the Amended 22 Complaint, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT with respect to the Ha Complaint.2 The 23 hearing set for February 27, 2018 with respect to the same is VACATED. 24 \\ 25 \\ 26 1 27 28 The same Motion to Dismiss was filed in civil action 15-cv-01890-YGR (“Hamilton”). (See Dkt. No. 38.) 2 The corresponding request for judicial notice (Dkt. No. 22) is also DENIED AS MOOT. 1 This Order terminates Docket Number 20. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: February 9, 2018 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?