Hirsch et al v. Brentwood Union School District et al

Filing 53

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 52 . Hearing re Joint Discovery Letter is reset for 8/11/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 6/29/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 PETER W. ALFERT, ESQ. (SBN 83139) TERESA LI, ESQ. (SBN 278779) HINTON ALFERT, PC 200 Pringle Ave., Suite 450 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 279-3009 Facsimile: (925) 279-3342 Email: palfert@hintonalfert.com tli@hintonalfert.com LOUIS A. LEONE, ESQ. (SBN: 099874) CLAUDIA LEED, ESQ. (SBN: 122676) LEONE & ALBERTS 2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 900 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 974-8600 Facsimile: (925) 974-8601 Email: leonel@stubbsleone.com leedc@stubbsleone.com Attorneys for Defendants BRENTWOOD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT CONSTANCE FORREST and MARGARET KRUSE 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 ADAM HIRSCH and CAMRON BALLESTEROS, 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case No.: 4:15-cv-04508 (JSW) Plaintiffs, vs. BRENTWOOD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, DINA HOLDER, CONSTANCE FORREST, LAURI JAMES, MARGARET KRUSE and DOES 1-30, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING HEARING RE JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER (Doc. #50) Defendants, 26 27 28 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING Case No.: 4:15-cv-04508- JSW HEARING RE JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER (Doc. #50) 1 1 2 The parties to this action hereby stipulate, by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, as follows: 3 4 WHEREAS, the Court (No. 51) noticed a hearing re the parties’ Joint Discovery Letter (No. 50) before Judge Ryu on July 21, 2016, at 11:00 a.m. 5 WHEREAS, plaintiffs’ counsel are unable to provide attorney coverage on the 6 hearing on the date due to multiple conflicting Court hearings previously scheduled in 7 other actions. 8 9 WHEREAS, the parties have contacted Judge Ryu’s scheduling clerk who has advised that the Court is available August 11, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. for hearing this matter. 10 11 WHEREAS, all the parties have agreed that they are available on the Court’s next available hearing date, August 11, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. 12 The parties therefore respectfully request that the Court enter an order resetting 13 the hearing on the parties’ discovery dispute letter (No. 50) to August 11, 2016 at 11:00 14 a.m. 15 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 17 18 Dated: June 27, 2016 HINTON ALFERT, PC 19 By: 20 21 22 /s/ Teresa Li PETER ALFERT, ESQ. TERESA LI, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 23 Dated: June 27, 2016 LEONE & ALBERTS 24 25 26 27 By: /s/ Louis Leone LOUIS A. LEONE, ESQ. CLAUDIA LEED, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants 28 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING Case No.: 4:15-cv-04508- JSW HEARING RE JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER (Doc. #50) 2 1 BRENTWOOD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, JEAN ANTHONY, MARGO OLSON, and MARGARET KRUSE 2 3 4 Dated: June 28, 2016 DAVIS & YOUNG 5 By: 6 7 8 /s/ Eric Bengtson MARK E. DAVIS, ESQ. ERIC BENGTSON, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant DINA HOLDER 9 [PROPOSED] ORDER 10 11 12 13 14 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered as follows: The hearing on the parties’ joint discovery dispute letter (No. 50) is re-set to August 11, 2016, at 11:00 a.m. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED: S RT ER 23 24 R NIA o Judge D H 22 nna M. NO 21 _____________________________________ THE HON. DONNA M. RYU UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE yu R FO 20 June 29 DATED:_________________, 2016 TED GRAN LI 19 UNIT ED 18 RT U O 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 16 N F D IS T IC T O R C 25 26 27 28 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING Case No.: 4:15-cv-04508- JSW HEARING RE JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER (Doc. #50) 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?