Frazier v. Morgan Stanley & Co, LLC et al

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND re 23 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/21/15. (jebS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Sharon R. Vinick (SBN 129914)
Darci E. Burrell (SBN 180467)
LEVY VINICK BURRELL HYAMS LLP
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1300
Oakland, California 94612
Direct: 510-318-7702
Main: 510-318-7700
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

10

Linda D. Friedman (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Suzanne E. Bish (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Jennifer S. Gilbert (admitted pro hac vice)
STOWELL & FRIEDMAN, LTD.
303 W. Madison St., Suite 2600
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

11

Attorneys for Plaintiff

12

[additional counsel listed on next page]

7
8
9

13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

OAKLAND DIVISION

18
19

KATHY FRAZIER, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated,

20
21
22
23
24

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH
STIPULATION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT;
DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND

vs.
[CIVIL L.R. 6-1(a)]
MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC,
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY
LLC, AND MORGAN STANLEY,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH
STIP RE: SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT;
DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

DARYL S. LANDY (State Bar No. 136288)
[e-mail]
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
600 Anton Blvd., Suite 1800
Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7653
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
MARK S. DICHTER, admitted Pro Hac Vice
[e-mail]
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
1701 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
BLAIR ROBINSON, admitted Pro Hac Vice
[e-mail]
ANDREW SCHAFFRAN, admitted Pro Hac Vice
[e-mail]
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
101 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10178
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC,
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, and
Morgan Stanley

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH
STIP RE: SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT;
DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND

1

TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
WHEREAS Plaintiff Kathy Frazier filed her Complaint on September 30, 2015 (Docket

2
3

No. 1);

4

WHEREAS on October 2, 2015, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (Docket No. 4);

5

WHEREAS Defendants’ current deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is

6
7
8
9
10

December 18, 2015;
WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks to file of a Second Amended Complaint for the limited
purpose of adding claims for relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
WHEREAS this stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already
fixed by Court order.

11
12

THE PARTIES BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL HEREBY

13

STIPULATE and agree pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) that:

14
15
16
17
18
19

(1) Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint for the limited purpose of adding claims
for relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;
(2) Defendants are not required to respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint by the current
deadline of December 18, 2015;
(3) The deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint shall be
sixty (60) days from the date Plaintiff files her Second Amended Complaint.

20
Dated: December 18, 2015

LEVY VINICK BURR HYAMS LLP

21
By: /s/ Sharon Vinick
Sharon Vinick
Attorneys for Plaintiff

22
23
24

Dated: December 18, 2015

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

25

R NIA

S
UNIT
ED

ED
ORDER

IT IS SO

amilton

FO

yllis J. H

Judge Ph

A

H

LI

Phyllis J. Hamilton
E
C
F
UnitedRNStates ODistrict Judge
D IS T IC T
R
RT

28

December 21, 2015
Date

NO

27

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

26

By: /s/ Daryl S. Landy
Daryl S. Landy
Attorneys for Defendants

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

1

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH
STIP RE: SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT;
DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND