Frazier v. Morgan Stanley & Co, LLC et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 25 Stipulation and Proposed Order. Case Management Conference set for 1/7/16 is hereby vacated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/30/15. (jebS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sharon R. Vinick (SBN 129914) Darci E. Burrell (SBN 180467) LEVY VINICK BURRELL HYAMS LLP 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1300 Oakland, California 94612 Direct: 510-318-7702 Main: 510-318-7700 Fax: 510-318-7701 sharon@levyvinick.com Linda D. Friedman (pro hac vice forthcoming) Suzanne E. Bish (pro hac vice forthcoming) Jennifer S. Gilbert (admitted pro hac vice) STOWELL & FRIEDMAN, LTD. 303 W. Madison St., Suite 2600 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Phone: 312-431-0888 Fax: 312-431-0228 Lfriedman@sfltd.com 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 [additional counsel listed on next page] 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 OAKLAND DIVISION 18 19 KATHY FRAZIER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE vs. [CIVIL L.R. 6-1, 6-2] MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC, AND MORGAN STANLEY, Defendants. 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 DARYL S. LANDY (State Bar No. 136288) dlandy@morganlewis.com MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 600 Anton Blvd., Suite 1800 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7653 Tel: 714.830.0600 Fax: 714.830.0700 MARK S. DICHTER, admitted Pro Hac Vice mdichter@morganlewis.com MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Tel: 215.963.5000 Fax: 215.963.5001 BLAIR ROBINSON, pro hac vice pending (in Case No. 3:15-cv-04512) blair.robinson@morganlewis.com ANDREW SCHAFFRAN, pro hac vice pending (in Case No. 3:15-cv-04512) aschaffran@morganlewis.com MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 101 Park Avenue New York, NY 10178 Tel: 212.309.6000 Fax: 212.309.6001 Attorneys for Defendants Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, and Morgan Stanley 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Kathy Frazier (“Plaintiff”) and 2 Defendants Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, and Morgan 3 Stanley (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of 4 record, stipulate to continue the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 7, 5 2016, to a date that is mutually convenient for the Court after Defendants’ have responded to the 6 Second Amended Complaint. 7 8 9 WHEREAS, on October 16, 2015, the Court set the Case Management Conference for January 7, 2016 (Dkt. No. 8); WHEREAS pursuant the Parties’ concurrently-filed stipulation, Defendants have 10 consented to Plaintiff filing a Second Amended Complaint for the limited purpose of adding 11 claims for relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 12 13 14 WHEREAS the Parties have stipulated that Defendants will have sixty (60) days after filing to respond to the Second Amended Complaint; WHEREAS the Parties believe that it would be beneficial to postpone the initial Case 15 Management Conference until after Defendants have responded to the Second Amended 16 Complaint 17 WHEREAS Plaintiff believes it would be particularly beneficial to postpone the initial 18 Case Management Conference in light of the pending motion to transfer to avoid burden to the 19 Court in the event it is granted; 20 THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED by the Parties and respectfully requested that the 21 Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 7, 2016, be continued to a date 22 that is convenient for the Court after Defendants have responded to the Second Amended 23 Complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9 and this Court’s Standing Orders, the Parties 24 will submit a joint case management conference statement seven (7) court days prior to the 25 newly-scheduled conference. 26 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 27 28 2 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC 1 2 Dated: December 21, 2015 LEVY VINICK BURRELL HYAMS LLP By: /s/ Sharon Vinick Sharon R. Vinick Attorneys for Plaintiff 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: December 21, 2015 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP By: /s/ Daryl S. Landy Daryl S. Landy Attorneys for Defendants 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC 1 2 3 4 ATTESTATION RE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES I, Sharon R. Vinick, attest pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) that all other signatories to this document, on whose behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized this filing. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the 5 6 United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 7 8 9 Dated: December 21, 2015 LEVY VINICK BURRELL HYAMS LLP BY: 10 /s/ Sharon R. Vinick Sharon R. Vinick Attorneys for Plaintiff 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the Order setting the Case Management Conference for January 7, 2016 is hereby vacated. The Court will set a new Case Management Conference for a 4 date after Defendants have responded to the Second Amended Complaint. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 6 ERED R NIA _____________________________________ Hon. Phyllis J. Hamiltonilton Ham hyllis J. Ju ge P United States dDistrict Judge H ER LI RT FO NO 8 O ORD IT IS S 9 A DATED: ________________________ December 30, 2015 7 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 3 N F D IS T IC T O R C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?