Washington v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc. et al
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER ; Stipulation and Federal Rule Of Evidence 502(d) [Proposed] Order filed by Belencia Washington, Kindred Healthcare, Inc., Kindred Nursing Centers West, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 7/28/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
Daniel L. Feder (SBN 130867)
THE LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL FEDER
332 Pine St., Ste .700
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel.: (415) 391-9476
Fax: (415) 391-9432
E-mail: danfeder@pacbell.net
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BELENCIA WASHINGTON
6
7
8
9
Robert M. Pattison (State Bar No. 103528)
JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
50 California Street, 9th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4615
Telephone: (415) 394-9400
Facsimile: (415) 394-9401
E-mail: pattisonr@jacksonlewis.com
10
11
Attorneys for Defendants
KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC. and
KINDRED NURSING CENTERS WEST, LLC
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
BELENCIA WASHINGTON, an individual,
17
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
20
KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC., a
Delaware Corporation; KINDRED NURSING
CENTERS WEST, LLC, a limited liability
Corporation,
Case No. 4:15-cv-04528-KAW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d)
ORDER
Complaint Filed: 10/01/2015
Trial Date: None Set
21
Defendants.
22
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FEDERAL
RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d) ORDER
Case No. 4:15-cv-04528-KAW
1
2
To facilitate discovery in this matter, the parties respectfully request the Court enter the
following order pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d):
3
The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically stored
4
information (“ESI”) or other information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the
5
privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This
6
Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of
7
Evidence 502(d). Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party’s right to
8
conduct a review of documents, ESI or information (including metadata) for relevance,
9
responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production.
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
Dated: July 28, 2016
THE LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL FEDER
12
13
By:
14
/s/
Daniel L. Feder
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BELENCIA WASHINGTON
15
16
Dated: July 28, 2016
JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
17
By:
18
19
20
/s/
Robert M. Pattison
Attorneys for Defendants
KINDRED HEALTHCARE SERVICES,
INC. and KINDRED NURSING CENTERS
WEST, LLC
21
[PROPOSED] ORDER
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
7/28
Dated: ________________, 2016
26
_______________________________
Honorable Kandis A. Westmore
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
4848-0666-0405, v. 1
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FEDERAL
RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d) ORDER
Case No. 4:15-cv-04528-KAW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?