Jeanne Stathakos, et al v. Columbia Sportswear Company

Filing 134

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF re 131 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION for a Short One-Week Extension of Plaintiffs' Deadline to File Their Reply, and a 10-page Extension of the 15-page Limit re 129 MOTION. Plai ntiff Reply due by 1/12/2018. Motion Hearing set for 1/30/2018 is CONTINUED to 2/6/2018 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/3/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2018)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

JEANNE STATHAKOS, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,

7
8
9
10

CASE NO. 15-cv-04543-YGR
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

vs.
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY, ET AL.,

Re: Dkt. No. 131

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14

The Court, having considered all the papers filed by the parties in connection with
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Administrative Relief (Dkt. No. 131), hereby ORDERS as follows:
1. Plaintiffs’ request for a one-week extension to file their reply in support of their motion

15

for attorney’s fees and costs is GRANTED. They must file their reply no later than

16

January 12, 2018.

17

2. Plaintiffs’ request for a 10-page extension of the 15-page limit for their reply in support

18

of their motion for attorney’s fees and costs is GRANTED. Their reply must not exceed

19

25 pages.

20

3. Defendants’ request to file a sur-reply to plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees and costs

21

is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs are reminded that any new evidence

22

submitted on reply must be responsive to points raised by defendants in their

23
24
25
26
27
28

opposition. See Sanchez v. Cnty. of San Bernardino, No. CV-10-09384 MMM (OPx),
2014 WL 12734756, at *4 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2014) (“The court can properly consider
evidence and argument offered in reply that is responsive to points raised in the nonmoving party’s opposition . . . .”) To the extent plaintiffs submit new evidence on
reply, defendants may file corresponding objections pursuant to L.R. 7-3(d)(1), and the
Court may rule on the evidence accordingly.

1

4. Defendants’ request to continue the hearing date on plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s

2

fees and costs is GRANTED. The hearing is CONTINUED to Tuesday, February 6,

3

2018 on the Court’s 2:00 p.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street,

4

Oakland, California, Courtroom 1.

5

This Order terminates Docket Number 131.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated: January 3, 2018
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2