Jeanne Stathakos, et al v. Columbia Sportswear Company
ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS re 93 Objection, filed by Columbia Sportswear Company. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/25/17. (fsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JEANNE STATHAKOS, ET AL.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
CASE NO. 15-cv-04543-YGR
ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS’
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY, ET AL.,
Re: Dkt. No. 93
On April 24, 2017, shortly before the Court filed its order striking portions of plaintiffs’
statement of recent decision for violation of Civil Local Rule 7-3(d)(2) (Dkt. No. 94), defendants
filed objections to the same (Dkt. No. 93).
The Court notes that defendants’ filing at Docket Number 93 also violates Local Rule 7-
3(d), which provides that “no additional memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior
Court approval” except for objections to reply evidence and statements of recent decision, and any
objections to reply evidence “may not include further argument on the motion.” Defendants’
filing falls in neither category, and, even if characterized as an objection to evidence filed in reply,
defendants’ filing includes their own summaries and analyses of the cases cited, which goes
beyond what the rules allow.
The filing is hereby STRICKEN.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 25, 2017
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?