Jeanne Stathakos, et al v. Columbia Sportswear Company

Filing 97

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS re 93 Objection, filed by Columbia Sportswear Company. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/25/17. (fsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2017)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

JEANNE STATHAKOS, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

CASE NO. 15-cv-04543-YGR
ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS’
OBJECTIONS

vs.
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY, ET AL.,

Re: Dkt. No. 93

Defendants.
On April 24, 2017, shortly before the Court filed its order striking portions of plaintiffs’

12

statement of recent decision for violation of Civil Local Rule 7-3(d)(2) (Dkt. No. 94), defendants

13

filed objections to the same (Dkt. No. 93).

14

The Court notes that defendants’ filing at Docket Number 93 also violates Local Rule 7-

15

3(d), which provides that “no additional memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior

16

Court approval” except for objections to reply evidence and statements of recent decision, and any

17

objections to reply evidence “may not include further argument on the motion.” Defendants’

18

filing falls in neither category, and, even if characterized as an objection to evidence filed in reply,

19

defendants’ filing includes their own summaries and analyses of the cases cited, which goes

20

beyond what the rules allow.

21

The filing is hereby STRICKEN.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: April 25, 2017
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE