Jeanne Stathakos, et al v. Columbia Sportswear Company

Filing 97

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS re 93 Objection, filed by Columbia Sportswear Company. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/25/17. (fsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JEANNE STATHAKOS, ET AL., Plaintiffs, 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 CASE NO. 15-cv-04543-YGR ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS vs. COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY, ET AL., Re: Dkt. No. 93 Defendants. On April 24, 2017, shortly before the Court filed its order striking portions of plaintiffs’ 12 statement of recent decision for violation of Civil Local Rule 7-3(d)(2) (Dkt. No. 94), defendants 13 filed objections to the same (Dkt. No. 93). 14 The Court notes that defendants’ filing at Docket Number 93 also violates Local Rule 7- 15 3(d), which provides that “no additional memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior 16 Court approval” except for objections to reply evidence and statements of recent decision, and any 17 objections to reply evidence “may not include further argument on the motion.” Defendants’ 18 filing falls in neither category, and, even if characterized as an objection to evidence filed in reply, 19 defendants’ filing includes their own summaries and analyses of the cases cited, which goes 20 beyond what the rules allow. 21 The filing is hereby STRICKEN. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 25, 2017 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?