The Religious and Charitable Risk Pooling Trust of the Brothers of The Christian Schools and Affiliates v. Mauer

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE re 4 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Remanding Case to San Francisco Superior Court filed by Cynthia Mauer, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 10/13/15. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 STUART G. GROSS (#251019) sgross@gross-law.com DANIEL C. GOLDBERG (#287923) dgoldberg@gross-law.com GROSS LAW, P.C. The Embarcadero Pier 9, Suite 100 San Francisco, CA 94111 t (415) 671-4628 f (415) 480-6688 7 8 Counsel for Defendant 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 15 16 THE RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE RISK POOLING TRUST OF THE BROTHERS OF THE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS AND AFFILIATES, 17 Plaintiffs, 18 19 CASE NO. 15-cv-04584-KAW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REMANDING CASE TO SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT v. CYNTHIA MAUER, a.k.a, CINDY MAUER, and DOES 1 THROUGH 10 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GROSS LAW, P.C. THE EMBARCADERO PIER 9, SUITE 100 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REMANDING CASE TO SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT; NO. 15-cv04584-KAW 1 WHEREAS Plaintiff Religious and Charitable Risk Pooling Trust of the Brothers of the 2 Christian Schools and Affiliates (“Plaintiff”) commenced a civil action in the Superior Court of 3 San Francisco titled: The Religious and Charitable Risk Pooling Trust of the Brothers of the 4 Christian Schools and Affiliates v. Cynthia Mauer, Case Number CGC-14-544195 (the 5 “Pending Action”); 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 WHEREAS Defendant Cynthia Mauer (“Defendant”) subsequently removed the Pending Action to this Court solely on the basis of diversity jurisdiction; WHEREAS Defendant’s removal was in error under 28 U.S.C. section 1441(b)(2) because Defendant is a citizen of the State of California; WHEREAS counsel for Plaintiff has authorized the undersigned counsel for Defendant to electronically sign this stipulation on his behalf; and WHEREAS, Plaintiff reserves all rights to file a motion for remand in the event that this stipulation is not accepted by the Court; 14 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN DEFENDANT AND 15 PLAINTIFF THROUGH THEIR UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL, SUBJECT TO COURT 16 APPROVAL: 17 1. The Pending Action is remanded to the Superior Court of San Francisco. 18 2. The parties will bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. 19 Dated: October 8, 2015 GROSS LAW, P.C. 20 By: 21 22 /s/Stuart G. Gross Stuart G. Gross Counsel for Defendant 23 24 25 Dated: October 8, 2015 WEINTRAUB TOBIN CHEDIAK COLEMAN GRODIN 26 By: 27 28 GROSS LAW, P.C. THE EMBARCADERO PIER 9, SUITE 100 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 /s/Daniel C. Zamora Daniel C. Zamora Counsel for Plaintiff ____________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REMANDING CASE TO SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT; NO. 15-cv04584-KAW 1 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 2 Dated: _________________ 10/13/15 3 By: ___________________________________ The Honorable Judge Kandis A. Westmore 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GROSS LAW, P.C. THE EMBARCADERO PIER 9, SUITE 100 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REMANDING CASE TO SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT; NO. 15-cv04584-KAW 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?