Brattain v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER GRANTING 24 STIPULATION RE Briefing Schedule. Responses due by 1/13/2016. Replies due by 1/27/2016. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/15/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2015) Modified on 12/15/2015 (jjoS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 David C. Kiernan (State Bar No. 215335) dkiernan@JonesDay.com JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: +1.415.626.3939 Facsimile: +1.415.875.5700 Attorneys for Defendants Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company and Reynolds American Inc. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 RUSSELL BRATTAIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC., and DOES 1 through 59, Defendants. Case No. 4:15-cv-04705-JSW Judge Jeffrey S. White STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Complaint Filed October 9, 2015 No Trial Date Assigned STIPULATED REQUEST FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE On October 12, 2015, Plaintiff served a 111-paragraph class-action Complaint against 22 Sante Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. and Reynolds American, Inc. (“Defendants”), alleging 23 five causes of action challenging Defendants’ use of terms “100% additive-free,” “natural” and/or 24 “organic” in the marketing of American Spirits cigarettes. Plaintiff seeks to represent a class of 25 all persons in the State of California who purchased American Spirits. 26 On December 14, 2015, Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint in its entirety on the 27 grounds (among others) that it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and each 28 cause of action is preempted by federal law. Under the local rules, Plaintiff’s opposition is due Stipulated Req. For Briefing Schedule Case No. 4:15-cv-04705-JSW 1 fourteen days later on December 28, 2015, and Defendants’ reply is due seven days after 2 Plaintiff’s opposition on January 4, 2016. 3 In light of the holidays and the issues to be briefed, including federal preemption, the 4 parties agree that Plaintiff be allowed an additional fourteen days to file his opposition and 5 Defendants be allowed an additional seven days to file their reply. 6 7 NOW THEREFORE the parties hereby agree, stipulate, and request that the Court enter the following briefing schedule: 8 Plaintiff’s opposition is due January 13, 2016; and 9 Defendants’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss is due by January 27, 2016. 10 11 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: December 15, 2015 JONES DAY 13 14 By: 15 Attorneys for Defendants Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company and Reynolds American Inc. 16 17 18 /S/ David C. Kiernan David C. Kiernan Dated: December 15, 2015 EGGNATZ, LOPATIN & PASCUCCI, LLP 19 20 By: 21 22 23 24 25 /S/ Benjamin M. Lopatin Benjamin M. Lopatin 2201 Market Street, Suite H San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: 415-324-8620 Facsimile: 415-520-2262 Attorneys for Plaintiff Russell Brattain 26 27 28 -2- Stipulated Req. For Briefing Schedule Case No. 4:15-cv-04705-JSW 1 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. December 15, 2015 DATED: __________________ 4 ______________________________________________ THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i), I attest that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Benjamin M. Lopatin which shall serve in lieu of his signature. By: /S/ David C. Kiernan David C. Kiernan 10 11 12 13 NAI-1500647353v2 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- Stipulated Req. For Briefing Schedule Case No. 4:15-cv-04705-JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?