Brattain v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. et al
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING 24 STIPULATION RE Briefing Schedule. Responses due by 1/13/2016. Replies due by 1/27/2016. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/15/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2015) Modified on 12/15/2015 (jjoS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
David C. Kiernan (State Bar No. 215335)
dkiernan@JonesDay.com
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
+1.415.626.3939
Facsimile:
+1.415.875.5700
Attorneys for Defendants
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company
and Reynolds American Inc.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
RUSSELL BRATTAIN, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO
COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS
AMERICAN, INC., and DOES 1 through 59,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:15-cv-04705-JSW
Judge Jeffrey S. White
STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS
Complaint Filed October 9, 2015
No Trial Date Assigned
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE
On October 12, 2015, Plaintiff served a 111-paragraph class-action Complaint against
22
Sante Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. and Reynolds American, Inc. (“Defendants”), alleging
23
five causes of action challenging Defendants’ use of terms “100% additive-free,” “natural” and/or
24
“organic” in the marketing of American Spirits cigarettes. Plaintiff seeks to represent a class of
25
all persons in the State of California who purchased American Spirits.
26
On December 14, 2015, Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint in its entirety on the
27
grounds (among others) that it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and each
28
cause of action is preempted by federal law. Under the local rules, Plaintiff’s opposition is due
Stipulated Req. For Briefing Schedule
Case No. 4:15-cv-04705-JSW
1
fourteen days later on December 28, 2015, and Defendants’ reply is due seven days after
2
Plaintiff’s opposition on January 4, 2016.
3
In light of the holidays and the issues to be briefed, including federal preemption, the
4
parties agree that Plaintiff be allowed an additional fourteen days to file his opposition and
5
Defendants be allowed an additional seven days to file their reply.
6
7
NOW THEREFORE the parties hereby agree, stipulate, and request that the Court enter
the following briefing schedule:
8
Plaintiff’s opposition is due January 13, 2016; and
9
Defendants’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss is due by January 27, 2016.
10
11
12
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: December 15, 2015
JONES DAY
13
14
By:
15
Attorneys for Defendants
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company and
Reynolds American Inc.
16
17
18
/S/ David C. Kiernan
David C. Kiernan
Dated: December 15, 2015
EGGNATZ, LOPATIN & PASCUCCI, LLP
19
20
By:
21
22
23
24
25
/S/ Benjamin M. Lopatin
Benjamin M. Lopatin
2201 Market Street, Suite H
San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: 415-324-8620
Facsimile: 415-520-2262
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Russell Brattain
26
27
28
-2-
Stipulated Req. For Briefing Schedule
Case No. 4:15-cv-04705-JSW
1
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 15, 2015
DATED: __________________
4
______________________________________________
THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i), I attest that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been
obtained from Benjamin M. Lopatin which shall serve in lieu of his signature.
By: /S/ David C. Kiernan
David C. Kiernan
10
11
12
13
NAI-1500647353v2
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Stipulated Req. For Briefing Schedule
Case No. 4:15-cv-04705-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?