Franklin v. Brown et al
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO: (1) PROVIDE REQUIRED INFORMATION NECESSARY TO LOCATE DEFENDANTS RUFF AND CHAUS, AND (2)FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; granting 26 Mot ion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 26 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 19 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 11/4/2016.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JEFFREY ANTHONY FRANKLIN,
Case No. 15-cv-04755-YGR (PR)
GEORGE GIURBINO, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF SECOND
EXTENSION OF TIME TO: (1) PROVIDE
REQUIRED INFORMATION NECESSARY
TO LOCATE DEFENDANTS RUFF AND
CHAUS, AND (2) FILE OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
In an Order dated July 25, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiff an extension of time to provide
it with the required information necessary to locate Defendants Mike Ruff and Anthony Chaus,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Chiefs at the Office of Correctional Safety of the California Department of Corrections, because
service has been ineffective as to these Defendants. Dkt. 25. The Court also granted Plaintiff an
extension of time to file his opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Id.
Before the Court are Plaintiff’s requests for a second extension of time to (1) provide the
Court with the required information necessary to locate Defendants Ruff and Chaus and (2) file his
opposition. Having read and considered Plaintiff’s requests, and good cause appearing, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that his requests are GRANTED. The time in which Plaintiff may provide
the Court with the required information necessary to locate Defendants Ruff and Chaus will be
extended up to and including November 4, 2016. Failure to do so by the new deadline shall
result in the dismissal of all claims against Defendants Ruff and Chaus. Furthermore, the time
in which Plaintiff may file his opposition to will also be extended up to and including November
4, 2016. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after the date
Plaintiff’s opposition is filed.
No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
This Order terminates Docket No. 26.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 14, 2016
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?