White v. TD Bank USA, N.A.
Filing
33
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 31 Plaintiff's Motion to Continue Deadline for Response to Motion to Dismiss.(dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ELIZABETH WHITE,
Case No. 15-cv-04761-DMR
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
TD BANK USA, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE
FOR OPPOSITION TO MOTION
DISMISS AS MOOT
Re: Dkt. No. 31
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
On January 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to continue the January 19, 2016 deadline for
12
13
her opposition to the Defendant’s motion to dismiss. [Docket No. 31.] On January 19, 2016,
14
Plaintiff filed her opposition to the Defendant’s motion to dismiss. [Docket No. 32.]
In light of Plaintiff’s filing of her opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss by the
15
16
January 19, 2016 deadline, her motion to continue her deadline to file her opposition is denied as
17
moot.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 20, 2016
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?