White v. TD Bank USA, N.A.

Filing 33

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 31 Plaintiff's Motion to Continue Deadline for Response to Motion to Dismiss.(dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ELIZABETH WHITE,

Case No. 15-cv-04761-DMR

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

TD BANK USA, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE
FOR OPPOSITION TO MOTION
DISMISS AS MOOT
Re: Dkt. No. 31

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
On January 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to continue the January 19, 2016 deadline for

12
13

her opposition to the Defendant’s motion to dismiss. [Docket No. 31.] On January 19, 2016,

14

Plaintiff filed her opposition to the Defendant’s motion to dismiss. [Docket No. 32.]
In light of Plaintiff’s filing of her opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss by the

15
16

January 19, 2016 deadline, her motion to continue her deadline to file her opposition is denied as

17

moot.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 20, 2016
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge