White v. TD Bank USA, N.A.

Filing 55

ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference and Hearing on Motion to Enforce Settlement 51 to August 11, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. at the U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, 94612; Denying Stipulation to Shorten Notice Period 53 . Further Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2016 11:00 AM. Motion Hearing set for 8/11/2016 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 06/29/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ELIZABETH WHITE, Case No. 15-cv-04761-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 TD BANK USA, N.A., et al., Defendants. 11 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT; DENYING STIPULATION TO SHORTEN NOTICE PERIOD United States District Court Northern District of California Re: Dkt. Nos. 50, 51, 53 12 Notice is hereby given to all parties that the hearing on Defendant TD Bank USA, N.A.’s 13 motion to enforce settlement [Docket No. 51] noticed for hearing on July 20, 2016 is continued to 14 August 11, 2016 at 11:00 a.m at the U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, 15 16 17 94612. For courtroom number and floor information, please check the Court’s on-line calendar at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov (click “Calendars – Judges’ Weekly Calendars” link, then select Judge Ryu’s calendar). 18 The Case Management Conference previously scheduled for July 20, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. is 19 also continued to August 11, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. The parties’ updated Case Management 20 Statement is due August 4, 2016. 21 The parties’ stipulation to shorten the notice period on the motion to enforce the settlement 22 [Docket No. 53] is denied. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: June 29, 2016 26 27 28 ______________________________________ Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?