Valencia et al v. Comcast Corporation et al
Order by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas denying 56 Motion for Sanctions.(njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2017) Modified on 2/21/2017 (njvlc1, COURT STAFF). Modified on 2/21/2017 (njvlc1, COURT STAFF).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAMBERTO VALENCIA, et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-04771-JSW (NJV)
ORDER RE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
Re: Dkt. No. 56
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
On September 22, 2016, Defendant Comcast ("Comcast") filed a Motion for Sanctions in
this action. (Doc. 56.) Comcast alleged that 1) numerous Plaintiffs had not complied with the
court's order to provide signed and dated verifications to their interrogatory responses; 2) Plaintiff
Ryan Murray had failed to comply with the order to sit for his deposition or dismiss his case; 3)
certain Plaintiffs had failed to comply with the order to respond to particular requests for
production of documents, and 4) certain Plaintiffs' supplemental responses were incomplete. The
court held a hearing on this matter on November 1, 2016. (Doc. 71.) The matter was heard before
the court again on December 8, 2016. (Doc. 77.) At that hearing, Plaintiffs' counsel indicated that
all non-responding Plaintiffs would be dismissed. The parties confirmed that no issues remain to
be resolved at this time.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Comcast's Motion for Sanctions is
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 21, 2017
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?