Valencia et al v. Comcast Corporation et al

Filing 88

Order by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas denying 56 Motion for Sanctions.(njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2017) Modified on 2/21/2017 (njvlc1, COURT STAFF). Modified on 2/21/2017 (njvlc1, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

EUREKA DIVISION

7
8

LAMBERTO VALENCIA, et al.,

Case No. 15-cv-04771-JSW (NJV)

Plaintiffs,
9

ORDER RE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

v.

Re: Dkt. No. 56

10
11

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13

On September 22, 2016, Defendant Comcast ("Comcast") filed a Motion for Sanctions in

14

this action. (Doc. 56.) Comcast alleged that 1) numerous Plaintiffs had not complied with the

15

court's order to provide signed and dated verifications to their interrogatory responses; 2) Plaintiff

16

Ryan Murray had failed to comply with the order to sit for his deposition or dismiss his case; 3)

17

certain Plaintiffs had failed to comply with the order to respond to particular requests for

18

production of documents, and 4) certain Plaintiffs' supplemental responses were incomplete. The

19

court held a hearing on this matter on November 1, 2016. (Doc. 71.) The matter was heard before

20

the court again on December 8, 2016. (Doc. 77.) At that hearing, Plaintiffs' counsel indicated that

21

all non-responding Plaintiffs would be dismissed. The parties confirmed that no issues remain to

22

be resolved at this time.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Comcast's Motion for Sanctions is
DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 21, 2017
______________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge