Heyward v. Hayward Police Department et al
Filing
15
ORDER Relating Case 15-4802 DMR to Case No. 15-4799 JCS. Case No. 15-4802 DMR shall be reassigned to Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on February 5, 2016. (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2016)
UNIT
TED STATE DISTRIC COURT
ES
CT
T
NORTH
HERN DIST
TRICT OF C
CALIFORN
NIA
RELATED CASE OR
D
RDER
A
ive
o
Whether Case Should be Related or a
es
e
A Motion for Administrati Relief to Consider W
te
R
P
D
Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been
p
Sua Spont Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining R
filed. The time for filing an oppos
e
sition or stat
tement of su
upport has pa
assed. As th judge assig
he
gned
to case 15-cv-04799-J
JCS, Heywar v. 24 Hou Fitness, I find that th more recen filed cas
rd
urs
he
ntly
se
listed belo is related to the case assigned to me, and such case shall be reassigne to me.
ow
d
m
h
ed
Case
Title
Related
15-cv-04
4802DMR
Heyward v. Hayward Police
d
d
Departm
ment
Not
Related
x
ORDER
O
Th parties are instructed that all futur filings in a reassign case are t bear the
he
e
t
re
any
ned
to
initials of the newly assigned judg immediate after the case numbe Any case managemen
ge
ely
er.
nt
conference in any reas
ssigned case will be resc
e
cheduled by the Court. T parties s
The
shall adjust t
the
dates for the conference, disclosur and repor required b FRCivP 1 and 26 accordingly.
t
res
rt
by
16
Unless oth
herwise orde
ered, any dat for hearin noticed m
tes
ng
motions are v
vacated and m be remust
noticed by the moving party befor the newly assigned jud
y
g
re
dge; any dea
adlines set by the ADR L
Local
Rules rem in effect and any de
main
t;
eadlines esta
ablished in a case manag
gement order continue to
r
o
govern, ex
xcept dates for appearance in court, which will b reschedule by the ne
f
w
be
ed
ewly assigned
judge.
Dated: Feb
bruary 5, 20
016
By: ____
___________
__________
__
Joseph C Spero
C.
Chief Ma
agistrate Jud
dge
‐1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?