Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund et al v. Reinegger Frame and Wheel, Inc.
Filing
25
ORDER to Submit Supplemental Briefing in Support of Plaintiffs' MOTION for Default Judgment 20 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 6/3/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES PENSION
TRUST FUND, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No. 15-cv-04815-DMR
ORDER TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
v.
REINEGGER FRAME AND WHEEL, INC.,
Re: Dkt. No. 20
Defendant.
On May 19, 2016, Plaintiffs Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund and Automotive
13
Industries Welfare Trust Fund and their Trustees (“Plaintiffs”) filed a motion for default judgment.
14
[Docket No. 20.] Having reviewed that motion, the court determines that Plaintiffs’ accounting of
15
its attorneys’ fees requires further support. While the Declaration of Anne M. Bevington [Docket
16
No. 23] provides an employment background for Bevington and paralegal Julia Jellen, for whom
17
attorney’s fees are requested, the Declaration does not indicate how the hours were spent. Plaintiff
18
requests ten (10) hours for Bevington’s work on this matter and thirty-five (35) hours for Paralegal
19
Jellen’s work without further explanation. Bevington Decl. ¶¶ 14-15.
20
Plaintiff must submit a more detailed accounting sufficient to support Plaintiff’s requested
21
award of reasonable attorneys’ fees for litigating this action, with enough detail such that the court
22
may determine whether the time spent was “excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary.”
23
Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983); Bd. of Trs. of the Boilermaker Vacation Trust v.
24
Skelly, Inc., 389 F. Supp. 2d 1222, 1226 (N.D. Cal. 2005) (analyzing the declarations regarding
25
attorney time expended on motion for default judgment to determine a reasonable award of
26
attorneys’ fees); see also N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 54-5.
27
28
Plaintiffs shall submit additional briefing by 1 p.m. on June 10, 2016 to address the above
deficiency in the motion for default judgment. Any opposition or statement of non-opposition is
1
2
3
due no later than June 17, 2016.
Immediately upon receipt of this Order, Plaintiffs shall serve Defendant with a copy
of this Order and file a proof of service with the court.
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 3, 2016
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?