Lee v. Tatoumik Limited

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Tatoumik Limited, Myoung Ho Lee, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/21/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2017)

Download PDF
1 COMAR LAW 2 3 4 5 D. Inder Comar (SBN 243732) inder@comarlaw.com 995 Market Street, Second Floor San Francisco, CA 94103 Telephone: +1.415.562.6790 Facsimile: +1.415.513.0445 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CASE NO. 4-15-cv-04819 KAW 12 MYOUNG HO LEE, Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. TATOUMIK LIMITED, d/b/a “Mary 15 Katrantzou,” 16 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN MYOUNG HO LEE AND TATOUMIK LIMITED, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Judge: Hon. Kandis Westmore Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, Civ. L.R. 7-12, and the agreement of the parties, Plaintiff Myoung Ho Lee (“Lee”) on the one hand, and Defendant Tatoumik Limited (“Tatoumik”) on the other hand, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. In this action, via its Complaint Lee asserted claims of infringement of 26 U.S. Copyright Registration No. VA0001968065, violation of the Lanham Act, and related 27 claims against Tatoumik. 28 COMAR LAW STIPULATION REGARDING RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT; CASE NO. 4:15-cv-04819 KAW 1 2. Tatoumik filed an Answer to the Complaint, denying all material 2 allegations asserted therein and denying liability. 3 3. Lee and Tatoumik have now reached an agreement to settle their 4 differences relating to the above-captioned action. 5 6 7 8 4. All claims Lee asserted against Tatoumik, including those asserted in its Complaint in the above-captioned action are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 5. The parties shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees in 9 connection with the action. 10 11 Dated: February 24 2017 __, 12 13 Respectfully Submitted, 14 /S/ Owen Seitel Owen Seitel Crown, LLP Counsel for Defendant, Tatoumik Limited 15 16 /S/ D. Inder Comar D. Inder Comar Counsel for Plaintiff Myoung Ho Lee 17 18 I hereby attest that I have the consent of all electronic signatures indicated by a 19 “conformed” signature (/S/) within this efiled document. 20 /S/ D. Inder Comar D. Inder Comar 21 Counsel for plaintiff Myoung Ho Lee 22 23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 24 Dated: ____________________ 3/21/17 25 Honorable Kandis Westmore United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 COMAR LAW 2 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 4:15-cv-04819 KAW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?