Velasquez v. New Penn Financial, LLC et al
Filing
51
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE.Court VACATES hearing on Motion to Dismiss set 5/24/16; Denying Motion Dkt. No. 50 as moot. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzales Rogers on 5/16/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2016)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
RODOLFO VELASQUEZ,
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 15-cv-04863 YGR
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO
ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the Court refers the above13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
styled civil action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) Unit for a telephone conference
to assess this case=s suitability for court-sponsored mediation, settlement conference, early neutral
evaluation, or other ADR methods. Plaintiff and Defendants= counsel shall participate in a
telephone conference, to be scheduled by the ADR Unit as soon as reasonably practicable.
The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time the telephone conference will be
held. After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the Court of its recommendation
for further ADR proceedings.
The Court VACATES the hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss currently set for May 24,
2016, and DENIES defendants motion to appear by telephone (Dkt. No. 50) as moot. The Court
may re-set the hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss, if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: May 16, 2016
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?