Velasquez v. New Penn Financial, LLC et al

Filing 51

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE.Court VACATES hearing on Motion to Dismiss set 5/24/16; Denying Motion Dkt. No. 50 as moot. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzales Rogers on 5/16/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2016)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 RODOLFO VELASQUEZ, 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-cv-04863 YGR ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, et al., Defendants. 11 12 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the Court refers the above13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 styled civil action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) Unit for a telephone conference to assess this case=s suitability for court-sponsored mediation, settlement conference, early neutral evaluation, or other ADR methods. Plaintiff and Defendants= counsel shall participate in a telephone conference, to be scheduled by the ADR Unit as soon as reasonably practicable. The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time the telephone conference will be held. After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the Court of its recommendation for further ADR proceedings. The Court VACATES the hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss currently set for May 24, 2016, and DENIES defendants motion to appear by telephone (Dkt. No. 50) as moot. The Court may re-set the hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 16, 2016 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?