Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Filing
93
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 92 Stipulation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
MATTHEW D. POWERS (S.B. #212682)
mpowers@omm.com
E. CLAY MARQUEZ (S.B. #268424)
cmarquez@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3823
Telephone:
(415) 984-8700
Facsimile:
(415) 984-8701
Attorneys for Defendant
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
Benjamin S. Thomassen (pro hac vice)
bthomassen@edelson.com
EDELSON PC
350 North LaSalle Street, 13th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Tel: 312.589.6370
Fax: 312.589.6378
Stewart R. Pollock (SBN – 301356)
spollock@edelson.com
Rafey S. Balabanian (pro hac vice)
rbalabanian@edelson.com
EDELSON PC
123 Townsend Street
San Francisco, California 94107
Tel: 415.212.9300
Fax: 415.373.9435
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
TONY DICKEY and PAUL PARMER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
22
TONY DICKEY, and PAUL PARMER,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
23
24
25
26
v.
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., a
Delaware corporation,
Case No. 4:15-cv-04922-HSG
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ADVANCING MOTION TO
STRIKE HEARING
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
[Local Rule 6-2]
Defendant.
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION UNDER L.R. 6-2
CONTINUING MOT TO DISMISS HEARING
AND CASE MGT CONFERENCE 3:15-cv-04922
1
Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Tony Dickey and Paul Parmer and
2
Defendant Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby
3
respectfully stipulate and agree, subject to Court approval, to advance the hearing on Plaintiff’s
4
Motion to Strike (presently scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on April 6, 2017) to proceed at the same time
5
as the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (presently scheduled for 2:00pm on March 17,
6
2017). In support of this Stipulation, the parties state as follows:
7
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2017, the Court continued the hearing on Defendant’s Motion
8
to Dismiss and the Parties’ Case Management Conference until March 17, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.,
9
(dkt. 88);
10
11
12
WHEREAS, the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike is presently set for April 6, 2017
at 2:00pm., (dkt. 85);
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that because portions of Defendant’s Reply in support of its
13
Motion to Dismiss are the subject of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike, advancing the hearing on the
14
Motion to Strike (and holding the hearings concurrently) would conserve judicial resources and
15
avoid the need for separate hearings;
16
17
18
19
WHEREAS, apart from advancing the April 6, 2017 motion hearing date, this proposed
change will not alter the date of any other event or any deadline already fixed by Court order;
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows, subject to
Court approval:
20
The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike shall be advanced to March 17, 2017 at 2:00
21
p.m., or to such other date that is convenient for the Court.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
JOINT STIPULATION UNDER L.R. 6-2
ADVANCING MOT TO STRIKE HEARING
4:15-cv-04922
1
Dated: March 3, 2017
2
E. CLAY MARQUEZ
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
3
By: /s/ E. Clay Marquez
E. Clay Marquez
4
Attorneys for Defendant
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
5
6
7
8
9
Dated: March 3, 2017
BENJAMIN S. THOMASSEN
EDELSON PC
By: /s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen
Benjamin S. Thomassen
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
TONY DICKEY and PAUL PARMER
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
JOINT STIPULATION UNDER L.R. 6-2
ADVANCING MOT TO STRIKE HEARING
4:15-cv-04922
1
[PROPOSED ORDER]
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
The hearing on Plaintiff Tony Dickey and Paul Parmer’s Motion to Strike, scheduled for
4
April 6, 2017, is hereby reset for March 17, 2017 at 2:00 pm.
5
6
7
Dated: 3/6/2017
[__________]
HON. HAYWOOD S GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
JOINT STIPULATION UNDER L.R. 6-2
ADVANCING MOT TO STRIKE HEARING
4:15-cv-04922
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?