Liu v. UC Berkeley/UC Regents

Filing 16

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 15 Order Reassigning Case. Case Management Statement due by 1/28/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/4/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/30/15. Certificate of Service attached. (jebS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 AMY LIU, Case No. 15-cv-04958-PJH Plaintiff, 5 v. ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 6 7 UC BERKELEY/UC REGENTS, [Reassigned Case] Defendant. 8 9 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: The above matter having been reassigned to the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton. It is hereby 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 ordered, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Civil L. R. 16-10, that a Case Management 12 Conference shall be held in this case on February 4, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 3, 3rd 13 Floor, Federal Building, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California. 14 Lead counsel shall meet and confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) prior to 15 the Case Management Conference with respect to those subjects set forth in Fed. R. Civ. 16 P. 16(c). Not less than seven (7) days before the conference, counsel shall file a joint 17 case management statement addressing each of the items listed in the "Standing Order 18 For All Judges of the Northern District -- Contents of Joint Case Management statement," 19 which is attached to this order and can also be found on the court's website. A proposed 20 order is not necessary. Following the conference, the court will enter its own Case 21 Management and Pretrial Order. If any party is proceeding without counsel, separate 22 statements may be filed by each party. 23 Each party shall appear personally or by lead counsel prepared to address all of 24 the matters referred to in this Order and with authority to enter stipulations and make 25 admissions pursuant to this Order. Any request to reschedule the date of the conference 26 shall be made in writing, and by stipulation if possible, at least ten (10) days before the 27 date of the conference and must be based upon good cause. 28 1 STANDING ORDER FOR ALL JUDGES 2 OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 CONTENTS OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 4 5 All judges of the Northern District of California require identical information in Joint Case 6 Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9. The parties must include the 7 following information in their statement which, except in unusually complex cases, should not 8 exceed ten pages: 9 1. Jurisdiction and Service: The basis for the court’s subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's claims and defendant’s counterclaims, whether any issues exist regarding personal 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 jurisdiction or venue, whether any parties remain to be served, and, if any parties remain to be 12 served, a proposed deadline for service. 13 2. 14 dispute. 15 3. 16 law, including reference to specific statutes and decisions. 17 4. Motions: All prior and pending motions, their current status, and any anticipated motions. 18 5. Amendment of Pleadings: The extent to which parties, claims, or defenses are expected to 19 be added or dismissed and a proposed deadline for amending the pleadings. 20 6. 21 Guidelines Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (“ESI Guidelines”), and 22 confirming that the parties have met and conferred pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) regarding 23 reasonable and proportionate steps taken to preserve evidence relevant to the issues reasonably 24 evident in this action. See ESI Guidelines 2.01 and 2.02, and Checklist for ESI Meet and Confer. 25 7. 26 requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, and a description of the disclosures made. 27 8. 28 proposed limitations or modifications of the discovery rules, a brief report on whether the parties Facts: A brief chronology of the facts and a statement of the principal factual issues in Legal Issues: A brief statement, without extended legal argument, of the disputed points of Evidence Preservation: A brief report certifying that the parties have reviewed the Disclosures: Whether there has been full and timely compliance with the initial disclosure Discovery: Discovery taken to date, if any, the scope of anticipated discovery, any 2 1 have considered entering into a stipulated e-discovery order, a proposed discovery plan pursuant 2 to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and any identified discovery disputes. 3 9. Class Actions: If a class action, a proposal for how and when the class will be certified. 4 10. Related Cases: Any related cases or proceedings pending before another judge of this 5 court, or before another court or administrative body. 6 11. 7 damages sought and a description of the bases on which damages are calculated. In addition, any 8 party from whom damages are sought must describe the bases on which it contends damages 9 should be calculated if liability is established. Relief: All relief sought through complaint or counterclaim, including the amount of any 12. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Settlement and ADR: Prospects for settlement, ADR efforts to date, and a specific ADR plan for the case, including compliance with ADR L.R. 3-5 and a description of key discovery or 12 motions necessary to position the parties to negotiate a resolution. 13 13. 14 magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. ___ Yes 15 ___ No 16 14. 17 special master, or the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. 18 15. 19 to expedite the presentation of evidence at trial (e.g., through summaries or stipulated facts), and 20 any request to bifurcate issues, claims, or defenses. 21 16. 22 Expedited Trial Procedure of General Order No. 64 Attachment A. If all parties agree, they shall 23 instead of this Statement, file an executed Agreement for Expedited Trial and a Joint Expedited 24 Case Management Statement, in accordance with General Order No. 64 Attachments B and D. 25 17. 26 dispositive motions, pretrial conference and trial. 27 18. 28 trial. Consent to Magistrate Judge For All Purposes: Whether all parties will consent to have a Other References: Whether the case is suitable for reference to binding arbitration, a Narrowing of Issues: Issues that can be narrowed by agreement or by motion, suggestions Expedited Trial Procedure: Whether this is the type of case that can be handled under the Scheduling: Proposed dates for designation of experts, discovery cutoff, hearing of Trial: Whether the case will be tried to a jury or to the court and the expected length of the 3 1 19. . 2 “Certification of Interested Entities or Persons” req o d P quired by Ci Local Ru 3-16. In a ivil ule addition, 3 ch st t nagement sta atement the c contents of i certificati by its ion eac party mus restate in the case man 4 ide entifying any persons, fir y rms, partners ships, corpor rations (incl luding paren corporation or other nt ns) 5 ent tities known by the party to have eith (i) a fina y her: ancial intere in the sub est bject matter i in 6 con ntroversy or in a party to the proceed o ding; or (ii) a other kin of interes that could be any nd st 7 sub bstantially af ffected by th outcome of the procee he o eding. 8 20. . 9 Gu uidelines for Professional Conduct fo the Northe District o California or ern of a. 21. . 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Disclos sure of Non-p party Interes Entities or Persons: Whether ea party has filed the sted s ach s Profess sional Condu Whether all attorney of record f the partie have revie uct: r ys for es ewed the Such ot ther matters as may facil litate the just speedy an inexpensiv dispositio of this t, nd ve on ma atter. 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. Da ated: Decem mber 30, 2015 5 ___ __________ ___________ __________ ______ PH HYLLIS J. H HAMILTON N Un nited States D District Judg ge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1 2 3 UNITED STATES D D DISTRICT C COURT 4 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI RN CT IFORNIA 5 6 AMY LIU, A Case No. 1 15-cv-04958 8-PJH Plaintiff, 7 v. CERTIFIC CATE OF S SERVICE 8 9 UC BERKEL U LEY/UC REG GENTS, Defendant. . 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 I, the un ndersigned, hereby certify that I am an employe in the Offi of the Clerk, U.S. ee ice Dis strict Court, Northern Di istrict of Cal lifornia. That on December 30, 2015, I SERVED a t n S true and corr copy(ies of the atta rect s) ached OR RDER SETT TING CASE MANAGEM MENT CON NFERENCE, by placing said copy(ie in a , es) pos stage paid en nvelope addr ressed to the person(s) h e hereinafter listed, by dep positing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy( e (ies) into an inter-office delivery rec ceptacle loca in the ated Cle erk's office. 18 19 20 Am Liu my 105 Deer Creek Court 55 Ple easanton, CA 94566 A 21 22 ated: Decemb 30, 2015 ber 5 Da 23 24 25 Su usan Y. Soon ng Cl lerk, United States Distr Court d rict 26 27 28 By y:_________ ___________ _______ Je Ballard, Deputy Cler to the ean rk H Honorable PH HYLLIS J. H HAMILTON N 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?