Liu v. UC Berkeley/UC Regents
Filing
16
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 15 Order Reassigning Case. Case Management Statement due by 1/28/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/4/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/30/15. Certificate of Service attached. (jebS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
AMY LIU,
Case No. 15-cv-04958-PJH
Plaintiff,
5
v.
ORDER SETTING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
6
7
UC BERKELEY/UC REGENTS,
[Reassigned Case]
Defendant.
8
9
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The above matter having been reassigned to the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton. It is hereby
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
ordered, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Civil L. R. 16-10, that a Case Management
12
Conference shall be held in this case on February 4, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 3, 3rd
13
Floor, Federal Building, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California.
14
Lead counsel shall meet and confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) prior to
15
the Case Management Conference with respect to those subjects set forth in Fed. R. Civ.
16
P. 16(c). Not less than seven (7) days before the conference, counsel shall file a joint
17
case management statement addressing each of the items listed in the "Standing Order
18
For All Judges of the Northern District -- Contents of Joint Case Management statement,"
19
which is attached to this order and can also be found on the court's website. A proposed
20
order is not necessary. Following the conference, the court will enter its own Case
21
Management and Pretrial Order. If any party is proceeding without counsel, separate
22
statements may be filed by each party.
23
Each party shall appear personally or by lead counsel prepared to address all of
24
the matters referred to in this Order and with authority to enter stipulations and make
25
admissions pursuant to this Order. Any request to reschedule the date of the conference
26
shall be made in writing, and by stipulation if possible, at least ten (10) days before the
27
date of the conference and must be based upon good cause.
28
1
STANDING ORDER FOR ALL JUDGES
2
OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
CONTENTS OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
4
5
All judges of the Northern District of California require identical information in Joint Case
6
Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9. The parties must include the
7
following information in their statement which, except in unusually complex cases, should not
8
exceed ten pages:
9
1.
Jurisdiction and Service: The basis for the court’s subject matter jurisdiction over
plaintiff's claims and defendant’s counterclaims, whether any issues exist regarding personal
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
jurisdiction or venue, whether any parties remain to be served, and, if any parties remain to be
12
served, a proposed deadline for service.
13
2.
14
dispute.
15
3.
16
law, including reference to specific statutes and decisions.
17
4.
Motions: All prior and pending motions, their current status, and any anticipated motions.
18
5.
Amendment of Pleadings: The extent to which parties, claims, or defenses are expected to
19
be added or dismissed and a proposed deadline for amending the pleadings.
20
6.
21
Guidelines Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (“ESI Guidelines”), and
22
confirming that the parties have met and conferred pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) regarding
23
reasonable and proportionate steps taken to preserve evidence relevant to the issues reasonably
24
evident in this action. See ESI Guidelines 2.01 and 2.02, and Checklist for ESI Meet and Confer.
25
7.
26
requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, and a description of the disclosures made.
27
8.
28
proposed limitations or modifications of the discovery rules, a brief report on whether the parties
Facts: A brief chronology of the facts and a statement of the principal factual issues in
Legal Issues: A brief statement, without extended legal argument, of the disputed points of
Evidence Preservation: A brief report certifying that the parties have reviewed the
Disclosures: Whether there has been full and timely compliance with the initial disclosure
Discovery: Discovery taken to date, if any, the scope of anticipated discovery, any
2
1
have considered entering into a stipulated e-discovery order, a proposed discovery plan pursuant
2
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and any identified discovery disputes.
3
9.
Class Actions: If a class action, a proposal for how and when the class will be certified.
4
10.
Related Cases: Any related cases or proceedings pending before another judge of this
5
court, or before another court or administrative body.
6
11.
7
damages sought and a description of the bases on which damages are calculated. In addition, any
8
party from whom damages are sought must describe the bases on which it contends damages
9
should be calculated if liability is established.
Relief: All relief sought through complaint or counterclaim, including the amount of any
12.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Settlement and ADR: Prospects for settlement, ADR efforts to date, and a specific ADR
plan for the case, including compliance with ADR L.R. 3-5 and a description of key discovery or
12
motions necessary to position the parties to negotiate a resolution.
13
13.
14
magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. ___ Yes
15
___ No
16
14.
17
special master, or the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
18
15.
19
to expedite the presentation of evidence at trial (e.g., through summaries or stipulated facts), and
20
any request to bifurcate issues, claims, or defenses.
21
16.
22
Expedited Trial Procedure of General Order No. 64 Attachment A. If all parties agree, they shall
23
instead of this Statement, file an executed Agreement for Expedited Trial and a Joint Expedited
24
Case Management Statement, in accordance with General Order No. 64 Attachments B and D.
25
17.
26
dispositive motions, pretrial conference and trial.
27
18.
28
trial.
Consent to Magistrate Judge For All Purposes: Whether all parties will consent to have a
Other References: Whether the case is suitable for reference to binding arbitration, a
Narrowing of Issues: Issues that can be narrowed by agreement or by motion, suggestions
Expedited Trial Procedure: Whether this is the type of case that can be handled under the
Scheduling: Proposed dates for designation of experts, discovery cutoff, hearing of
Trial: Whether the case will be tried to a jury or to the court and the expected length of the
3
1
19.
.
2
“Certification of Interested Entities or Persons” req
o
d
P
quired by Ci Local Ru 3-16. In a
ivil
ule
addition,
3
ch
st
t
nagement sta
atement the c
contents of i certificati by
its
ion
eac party mus restate in the case man
4
ide
entifying any persons, fir
y
rms, partners
ships, corpor
rations (incl
luding paren corporation or other
nt
ns)
5
ent
tities known by the party to have eith (i) a fina
y
her:
ancial intere in the sub
est
bject matter i
in
6
con
ntroversy or in a party to the proceed
o
ding; or (ii) a other kin of interes that could be
any
nd
st
7
sub
bstantially af
ffected by th outcome of the procee
he
o
eding.
8
20.
.
9
Gu
uidelines for Professional Conduct fo the Northe District o California
or
ern
of
a.
21.
.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Disclos
sure of Non-p
party Interes Entities or Persons: Whether ea party has filed the
sted
s
ach
s
Profess
sional Condu Whether all attorney of record f the partie have revie
uct:
r
ys
for
es
ewed the
Such ot
ther matters as may facil
litate the just speedy an inexpensiv dispositio of this
t,
nd
ve
on
ma
atter.
12
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: Decem
mber 30, 2015
5
___
__________
___________
__________
______
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
N
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
1
2
3
UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT
4
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA
5
6
AMY LIU,
A
Case No. 1
15-cv-04958
8-PJH
Plaintiff,
7
v.
CERTIFIC
CATE OF S
SERVICE
8
9
UC BERKEL
U
LEY/UC REG
GENTS,
Defendant.
.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
I, the un
ndersigned, hereby certify that I am an employe in the Offi of the Clerk, U.S.
ee
ice
Dis
strict Court, Northern Di
istrict of Cal
lifornia.
That on December 30, 2015, I SERVED a t
n
S
true and corr copy(ies of the atta
rect
s)
ached
OR
RDER SETT
TING CASE MANAGEM
MENT CON
NFERENCE, by placing said copy(ie in a
,
es)
pos
stage paid en
nvelope addr
ressed to the person(s) h
e
hereinafter listed, by dep
positing said envelope in
the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(
e
(ies) into an inter-office delivery rec
ceptacle loca in the
ated
Cle
erk's office.
18
19
20
Am Liu
my
105 Deer Creek Court
55
Ple
easanton, CA 94566
A
21
22
ated: Decemb 30, 2015
ber
5
Da
23
24
25
Su
usan Y. Soon
ng
Cl
lerk, United States Distr Court
d
rict
26
27
28
By
y:_________
___________
_______
Je Ballard, Deputy Cler to the
ean
rk
H
Honorable PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
N
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?