Fieser v. Van Ness et al
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Defendants to Respond to Complaint and Reschedule Case Management Conference filed by Joseph M. Limber, John Varian, Paul D. Rubin, W. Denman Van Ness, Xoma Corporatio n, Kelvin M. Neu, Peter Barton Hutt, Patrick J. Scannon, Jack L. Wyszomierski, William K. Bowes, Jr., Deborah A. Fieser, Timothy P. Walbert Case Management Statement due by 3/15/2016. Case Management Conference set for 3/22/2016 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 1/11/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
COOLEY LLP
JOHN C. DWYER (136533) (dwyerjc@cooley.com)
JESSICA VALENZUELA SANTAMARIA (220934) (jsantamaria@cooley.com)
AMANDA A. MAIN (260814) (amain@cooley.com)
BRETT H. DE JARNETTE (292919) (bdejarnette@cooley.com)
3175 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130
Telephone:
(650) 843-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 849-7400
Attorneys for Defendants
W. DENMAN VAN NESS, WILLIAM K. BOWES, JR.,
PETER BARTON HUTT, JOSEPH M. LIMBER,
KELVIN M. NEU, PATRICK J. SCANNON,
JOHN VARIAN, TIMOTHY P. WALBERT,
PAUL D. RUBIN AND JACK L. WYSZOMIERSKI
and Nominal Defendant XOMA CORPORATION
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
DEBORAH A. FIESER, derivatively on
behalf of XOMA CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
v.
W. DENMAN VAN NESS, WILLIAM K.
BOWES, JR., PETER BARTON HUTT,
JOSEPH M. LIMBER, KELVIN M. NEU,
PATRICK J. SCANNON, JOHN
VARIAN, TIMOTHY P. WALBERT,
PAUL D. RUBIN AND JACK L.
WYSZOMIERSKI and Nominal Defendant
XOMA CORPORATION,
Case No. 4:15-CV-05236-KAW
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND RESCHEDULE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Judge: Honorable Kandis A. Westmore
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS’ TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
4:15-CV-05236
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12 Plaintiff Deborah A. Fieser (“Plaintiff”)
2
and Defendants W. Denman Van Ness, William K. Bowes, Jr., Peter Barton Hutt, Joseph M.
3
Limber, Kelvin M. Neu, Patrick J. Scannon, John Varian, Timothy P. Walbert, Paul D. Rubin,
4
Jack
5
“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate that good
6
cause exists to request an order from the Court extending Defendants’ deadline to respond to the
7
Complaint until February 19, 2016 and rescheduling the initial Case Management Conference
8
currently set in this action for February 16, 2016 to March 22, 2016, and to adjust accordingly
9
the related deadlines set forth therein.
L.
Wyszomierski,
and
Nominal
Defendant
XOMA
Corporation
(collectively,
10
WHEREAS, Joseph Markette filed a securities class action lawsuit against XOMA, John
11
Varian, and Paul Rubin relating to XOMA’s EYEGUARD-B study in the United States Court for
12
the Northern District of California, captioned Markette v. XOMA Corp., et. al., 3:15-CV-3425-
13
HSG, on July 24, 2015;
14
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Deborah A. Fieser filed this related shareholder derivative action,
15
captioned Fieser v. W. Denman Van Ness, et. cal., Case No. 4:15-CV-05236, in this Court on
16
November 16, 2015 (Dkt. No. 1) (“Fieser Complaint”);
17
18
WHEREAS, the Defendants’ responses to the Fieser Complaint are due by January 19,
2016;
19
WHEREAS, in an effort to avoid duplication of effort and maximize judicial economy,
20
the parties have been discussing relating the action to the Markette action as well as other
21
procedures, but have not yet reached an agreement;
22
WHEREAS, in order to conserve party and Court resources, Plaintiff and Defendants
23
agree to extend Defendants’ deadline to respond to the Fieser Complaint to February 19, 2016 to
24
provide the parties with additional time to reach agreement regarding relation;
25
WHEREAS Plaintiff and Defendants further agree that the initial Case Management
26
Conference should be rescheduled for March 22, 2016 and that all associated deadlines
27
(including ADR deadlines) be rescheduled accordingly;
28
///
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
2.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS’ TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
4:15-CV-05236
1
WHEREAS this stipulation shall not be deemed a waiver of any rights or defenses by any
2
party, including, but not limited to, the right of the Defendants to raise personal and subject
3
matter jurisdiction issues or to file any motions to dismiss or motions, the right to object to any
4
discovery requests on any grounds, and this stipulation shall in no way constitute an appearance
5
for the purpose of personal jurisdiction over any party;
6
7
8
NOW THEREFORE, THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between
the parties, through their respective counsel:
1.
9
10
To avoid duplicative efforts and promote judicial economy, Defendants shall have
no obligation to respond to the Fieser Complaint until February 19, 2015.
2.
The scheduled initial Case Management Conference will be rescheduled to March
11
22, 2016 and all related deadlines (including ADR deadlines) will be adjusted
12
accordingly.
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: January 6, 2015
COOLEY LLP
JESSICA VALENZUELA SANTAMARIA (220934)
JOHN C. DWYER (136533)
AMANDA A. MAIN (260814)
BRETT H. DE JARNETTE (292919)
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
/s/ Jessica Valenzuela Santamaria
Jessica Valenzuela Santamaria (220934)
Attorneys for Defendants W. DENMAN VAN NESS,
WILLIAM K. BOWES, JR., PETER BARTON HUTT,
JOSEPH M. LIMBER, KELVIN M. NEU, PATRICK J.
SCANNON, JOHN VARIAN, TIMOTHY P.
WALBERT, PAUL D. RUBIN AND JACK L.
WYSZOMIERSKI and Nominal Defendant XOMA
CORPORATION
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
3.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS’ TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
4:15-CV-05236
1
Dated: January 6, 2015
2
3
GREEN & NOBLIN, P.C.
ROBERT S. GREEN (136183)
JAMES ROBERT NOBLIN (114442)
And
4
FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD
WILLIAM B. FEDERMAN
5
6
7
/s/ Robert S. Green
Robert S. Green (136183)
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff DEBORAH A. FIESER
9
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
11
12
13
1/11/16
DATED: _____________________
__________________________________________
Honorable Kandis A. Westmore
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
4.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS’ TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
4:15-CV-05236
1
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
2
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 of The United States District Court for the Northern District of
3
California, I, Jessica Valenzuela Santamaria, hereby attest that the concurrence to the filing of the
4
foregoing document has been obtained from Robert S. Green, who provided the conformed
5
signature above.
6
Dated: January 6, 2015
7
8
COOLEY LLP
JESSICA VALENZUELA SANTAMARIA (220934)
JOHN C. DWYER (136533)
AMANDA A. MAIN (260814)
BRETT H. DE JARNETTE (292919)
9
10
/s/ Jessica Valenzuela Santamaria
Jessica Valenzuela Santamaria (220934)
11
Attorneys for Defendants W. DENMAN VAN NESS,
WILLIAM K. BOWES, JR., PETER BARTON HUTT,
JOSEPH M. LIMBER, KELVIN M. NEU, PATRICK J.
SCANNON, JOHN VARIAN, TIMOTHY P.
WALBERT, PAUL D. RUBIN AND JACK L.
WYSZOMIERSKI and Nominal Defendant XOMA
CORPORATION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
126116855
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
5.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS’ TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
4:15-CV-05236
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?