In Re Lee A. Pullum

Filing 16

ORDER PERMITTING LATE OPPOSITION BRIEF; SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF; AND STAYING BRIEFING ON MERITS PENDING RULING ON MOTION. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/25/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

IN RE LEE A. PULLUM,

8

Debtor.
ORDER PERMITTING LATE
OPPOSITION BRIEF; SETTING
DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF;
AND STAYING BRIEFING ON MERITS
PENDING RULING ON MOTION

9
10
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 15-cv-05270-JSW

Re: Docket No. 4

12

LEANNA PULLUM,

13

Appellant,

14

v.

15

EAGLE VISTA EQUITIES, LLC.,

16

Appellee.

17
18
19

On December 14, 2015, Appellee, Eagle Vista Equities, LLC, filed a motion to strike

20

portions of Appellant’s statement of issues for appeal. Appellant failed to file a timely opposition

21

brief, and the Court issued an Order to Show Cause directing Appellant to show cause why the

22

motion should not be granted as unopposed. Appellant filed a timely response to the Order to

23

Show Cause and has submitted a proposed opposition brief to the motion.

24
25

The Court has considered Appellant’s response to the Order to Show Cause, and is shall
allow Appellant to file an untimely opposition to the motion to strike.1 The proposed opposition,

26
27
28

1

The Court notes that much of Appellant’s response is directed to the merits of the appeal,
rather than the reasons why Appellant was not able to file a timely response to the motion. The
Court has not considered the former arguments to reach a decision on this Order.

1

file at Docket No. 15, ECF pages 7-11 shall be de
ed
t
eemed filed. Appellees s
shall file a re
eply by no

2

late than Febru
er
uary 8, 2016 Upon filin of the rep the matte will be de
6.
ng
ply,
er
eemed submi
itted, and

3

the Court shall resolve the motion on th papers.
e
he

4

On Janu
uary 20, 201 Appellan filed her op
16,
nt
pening brief which includes argume relating
f,
ents

5

to portions of the record th Appellees have move to strike. The Court H
p
t
hat
s
ed
HEREBY ST
TAYS

6

briefing on the merits until it has resolv the moti to strike. The Court shall re-set the briefing
l
ved
ion
.

7

sch
hedule in its Order resolv
ving the mot
tion to strike
e.

8
9

S
RED.
IT IS SO ORDER
Da
ated: January 25, 2016
y

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
JE
EFFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2